webpack-alternate-require-loader
v0.0.3
Published
Webpack alternate require loader
Downloads
8
Readme
Webpack Alternate Require Loader
This loader allows webpack to approximate arcane Node.js require
semantics for
advanced use cases when a normal require
doesn't suffice
Background
The Problem
Let's say you have a project like:
src/index.js
src/outside-of-resolution-path/node_modules/foo
if you try:
// src/index.js
// BAD: Fails
var foo = require("foo");
This will fail, because src/outside-of-resolution-path/node_modules
is not in
the resolution path, which is:
src/node_modules
node_modules
The Module Pattern
One solution to this problem is called the "module pattern", which adds
an extra file to start Node.js module resolution from a different directory.
Basically, say we add a simple file in a directory outside of the current
Node.js require
resolution path:
// src/outside-of-resolution-path/require.js
// Re-export the `require` to start resolution from `src/outside-of-resolution-path/node_modules`
module.exports = require;
And switched our importing code to:
// src/index.js
// GOOD: Module pattern (re-exported `require`) works!
var foo = require("./outside-of-resolution-path/require")("foo");
this works because the Node.js resolution path starts from the re-exported
require
:
src/outside-of-resolution-path/node_modules
src/node_modules
node_modules
Webpack
The above pattern works just fine for Node.js. Unfortunately, this non-standard
require
usage fails in Webpack.
Enter this loader, which allows a bridge for webpack builds to also use the module pattern / other non-standard requires.
Installation
The loader is available via npm:
$ npm install --save webpack-alternate-require-loader
Usage
The plugin takes a configuration object of a re-exported module path to search for in code and then a resolved path to that same code on disk like:
{
"CODE_TO_MATCH": require.resolve("REEXPORTED_CODE_PATH")
"./outside-of-resolution-path/require": require.resolve("./outside-of-resolution-path/require")
}
It will then effectively transform something like:
var foo = require("CODE_TO_MATCH")("foo");
var foo = require("./outside-of-resolution-path/require")("foo");
to:
var foo = require("/RESOLVED/PATH/TO/foo");
This effectively simulates what Node.js would do at execution time to the code.
Examples
A basic configuration:
module.exports = {
module: {
loaders: [
{
test: /\.js$/,
loader: "webpack-alternate-require-loader",
query: JSON.stringify({
"./outside-of-resolution-path/require": require.resolve("./outside-of-resolution-path/require")
})
}
]
}
};
Additional examples are provided in:
demo/webpack.config.js
. If you have a clone of this
repository with devDependencies
, you can run:
$ npm run build-demo-wp
and see the results in the demo
directory.
Notes
Do I have to use exactly the module / require pattern above?
Yes. Although Node.js can figure out:
var altRequire = require("./outside-of-resolution-path/require");
var foo = altRequire("foo");
This plugin currently cannot because it is naive and uses regexes. You must follow the form:
var foo = require("./outside-of-resolution-path/require")("foo");
Fortunately, if you are using
babel-plugin-replace-require
,
you can easily produce require
expressions that work with this plugin.
Why can't I just prepend the non-standard node_modules
path in code?
See the module pattern discussion page. Basically, with top-level
dependencies you can. But with nested dependencies and modern npm
/ yarn
the real depended on code can be located anywhere in the tree. And you need
the node_modules
search path to be different than normal.
You're using regexes? Yuck!
Indeed. But that's basically how webpack / some loaders roll. We stick to an easy pattern and avoid the cost of a full babel install + parsing. But, we may be open to real code parsing in the future.
Contributions
Contributions welcome! Make sure to pass $ npm run check
.