wdeasync
v0.1.120
Published
Turns async function into sync via JavaScript wrapper of Node event loop
Downloads
3,935
Maintainers
Readme
module::wDeasync
Deasync turns async function into sync, implemented with a blocking mechanism by calling Node.js event loop at JavaScript layer. The core of deasync is writen in C++.
About this fork
This fork is created to provide prebuild versions of the library. Original repository
Motivation
Suppose you maintain a library that exposes a function getData. Your users call it to get actual data: var myData = getData(); Under the hood data is saved in a file so you implemented getData using Node.js built-in fs.readFileSync. It's obvious both getData and fs.readFileSync are sync functions. One day you were told to switch the underlying data source to a repo such as MongoDB which can only be accessed asynchronously. You were also told to avoid pissing off your users, getData API cannot be changed to return merely a promise or demand a callback parameter. How do you meet both requirements?
You may tempted to use node-fibers or a module derived from it, but node fibers can only wrap async function call into a sync function inside a fiber. In the case above you cannot assume all callers are inside fibers. On the other hand, if you start a fiber in getData
then getData
itself will still return immediately without waiting for the async call result. For similar reason ES6 generators introduced in Node v0.11 won't work either.
What really needed is a way to block subsequent JavaScript from running without blocking entire thread by yielding to allow other events in the event loop to be handled. Ideally the blockage is removed as soon as the result of async function is available. A less ideal but often acceptable alternative is a sleep
function which you can use to implement the blockage like while( !done ) sleep( 100 );
. It is less ideal because sleep duration has to be guessed. It is important the sleep
function not only shouldn't block entire thread, but also shouldn't incur busy wait that pegs the CPU to 100%.
DeAsync supports both alternatives.
Usages
Generic wrapper of async function with conventional API signature function( p1, ...pn, function cb( error, result ){ } )
. Returns result
and throws error
as exception if not null:
var wdeasync = require( 'wdeasync' );
var cp = require( 'child_process' );
var exec = wdeasync( cp.exec );
// output result of ls -la
try
{
console.log(exec('ls -la'));
}
catch( err )
{
console.log( err );
}
// done is printed last, as supposed, with cp.exec wrapped in wdeasync; first without.
console.log( 'done' );
For async function with unconventional API, for instance function asyncFunction(p1,function cb(res){})
, use loopWhile(predicateFunc)
where predicateFunc
is a function that returns boolean loop condition
var done = false;
var data;
asyncFunction(p1,function cb(res)
{
data = res;
done = true;
});
require( 'wdeasync' ).loopWhile( function(){ return !done; } );
// data is now populated
Sleep (a wrapper of setTimeout)
function SyncFunction()
{
var ret;
setTimeout(function()
{
ret = "hello";
},3000);
while(ret === undefined)
{
require( 'wdeasync' ).sleep(100);
}
// returns hello with sleep; undefined without
return ret;
}
Installation
Unlike original implementation, this has binary distributed, so C++ compiler is not mandatory requirement. Altought, rare OS + CPU combinations might require to recompile wdeasync
.
To install, run
npm install wdeasync
Recommendation
Unlike other (a)sync js packages that mostly have only syntactic impact, DeAsync also changes code execution sequence. As such, it is intended to solve niche cases like the above one. If all you are facing is syntatic problem such as callback hell, using a less drastic package implemented in pure js is recommended.