watsign
v0.1.9
Published
Tweetnacl's ed25519 signatures, ported to WebAssembly for speed
Downloads
129
Maintainers
Readme
watsign
This library is a port of the signing part of tweetnacl to WebAssembly + JavaScript. It implements the ed25519 signature scheme. watsign works in all modern browsers as well as node and deno!
The code is based on and tested against tweetnacl-js. If you only need signing, we offer the following advantages:
- About 5x faster than tweetnacl-js, see comparison below
- Size impact is about 70% of tweetnacl-js: 7.4kB vs 10.6kB, minified + gzipped. (But tweetnacl-js contains much more than signing!)
watsign is even a bit faster than noble-ed25519, which uses built-in JS BigInt
for field arithmetic. As opposed to BigInt
, the algorithms here (from tweetnacl) are carefully designed to resist timing attacks and prevent memory access patterns depending on secret data.
The code is almost entirely written in raw WAT (Webassembly text format) and bundled to JS-friendly Wasm with watever, the WAT bundler written also by me. Fun fact: even the entry point of this lib is autogenerated from a WAT file (./src/sign.wat). There is no custom JS glue code.
npm i watsign
Usage
import {newKeyPair, sign, verify} from 'watsign';
let {publicKey, secretKey} = await newKeyPair();
let message = new TextEncoder().encode('Something I want to sign');
let signature = await sign(message, secretKey);
let ok = await verify(message, signature, publicKey);
console.log('everything ok?', ok);
In deno, you can import from github:
import {newKeyPair, sign, verify} from 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mitschabaude/watsign/main/mod.js';
API
The API is a streamlined version of nacl.sign from tweetnacl-js. The only differences are:
- All exported functions are async (this is dictated by WebAssembly, and also enables us to use native browser crypto for SHA-512)
- We only support detached signatures, so our
sign
isnacl.sign.detached
- There is just a normal named export for each function, no
nacl
object with nested sub-objects - There is only the "high-level" API, not the redundant "low-level" API (
crypto_sign
etc.) and no constants (nacl.sign.signatureLength
etc.)
Like in tweetnacl-js, all functions operate on Uint8Array
s.
The following is the full list of exported functions and their tweetnacl-js equivalents:
sign(message: Uint8Array, secretKey: Uint8Array): Promise<Uint8Array>
Sign a message with your secret key. Returns a 64 byte signature. Async version ofnacl.sign.detached
.verify(message: Uint8Array, signature: Uint8Array, publicKey: Uint8Array): Promise<boolean>
Verifies the signature, returns true if and only if it is valid. Async version ofnacl.sign.detached.verify
.newKeyPair(): Promise<{secretKey: Uint8Array, publicKey: Uint8Array}>
Creates a new, random key pair. Async version ofnacl.sign.keyPair
.keyPairFromSeed(seed: Uint8Array): Promise<{secretKey: Uint8Array, publicKey: Uint8Array}>
Deterministically creates a key pair from a 32-byte seed. Async version ofnacl.sign.keyPair.fromSeed
.keyPairFromSecretKey(secretKey: Uint8Array): Promise<{secretKey: Uint8Array, publicKey: Uint8Array}>
Re-creates the full key pair from the 64-byte secret key (which, in fact, has the public key stored in its last 32 bytes). Async version ofnacl.sign.keyPair.fromSecretKey
.
Performance
Performance compared to tweetnacl-js and noble-ed25519 on my computer (Intel i7-10700) in Chromium 93 (via puppeteer).
We are 4-6x faster than tweetnacl-js in the warmed-up regime and up to 33x faster on cold start after page load. Compared to noble-ed25519, we are 1.2-3x faster (warmed up) and up to 17x on cold start.
- watsign
First run after startup (varies between runs!):
sign (short msg): 2.99 ms
verify (short msg): 1.81 ms
sign (long msg): 1.32 ms
verify (long msg): 1.61 ms
Average of 50x after warm-up of 50x:
sign (short msg): 0.67 ± 0.06 ms
verify (short msg): 1.11 ± 0.03 ms
sign (long msg): 0.96 ± 0.06 ms
verify (long msg): 1.28 ± 0.02 ms
- tweetnacl-js
First run after startup (varies between runs!):
sign (short msg): 15.85 ms
verify (short msg): 8.45 ms
sign (long msg): 43.88 ms
verify (long msg): 12.18 ms
Average of 50x after warm-up of 50x:
sign (short msg): 2.86 ± 0.19 ms
verify (short msg): 5.65 ± 0.22 ms
sign (long msg): 5.70 ± 0.22 ms
verify (long msg): 7.21 ± 0.23 ms
- noble-ed25519
First run after startup (varies between runs!):
sign (short msg): 53.17 ms
verify (short msg): 3.72 ms
sign (long msg): 2.11 ms
verify (long msg): 3.97 ms
Average of 50x after warm-up of 50x:
sign (short msg): 1.00 ± 0.06 ms
verify (short msg): 3.09 ± 0.09 ms
sign (long msg): 1.27 ± 0.09 ms
verify (long msg): 3.24 ± 0.09 ms
Testing
# before you do anything else
npm install
# build wasm and separate entry-points for node / deno / browser
npm run build
# run performance comparison above
node test/performance.js