typeshave
v0.4.6
Published
Typecheck functionguards for function arguments and (nested) objects when it matters (REST payloads etc)
Downloads
32
Maintainers
Readme
TYPESHAVE
Prevent functions from exploding with garbage-in garbage-out.
Typecheck functionguards for function arguments and (nested) objects when it matters (REST payloads etc):
Usage:
typeshave = require("typeshave")
typesafe = typeshave.typesafe
var foo = typesafe({
foo: { type: "string" }
bar: { type: "integer", required:true }
}, (foo, bar) => {
return console.log("arguments are valid");
});
foo(1); // throws typesafe exception
NOTE: typeshave is built on the shoulders of the jsonschema standard.
Output:
Error:
{
"data": 1,
"errors": {
"errors": [
{
"message": "Argument foo should be string"
Why should I use this?
Ever ran into this situation? :
foo( { foo:"bar", bar: 123, records: [ 1, 2 ], cbs: [myfunction] } );
function foo(data){
if( data == undefined data.bar == undefined || bar == undefined || Argh this is a big PITA
// omg how do I even check properties recursively?
// argh..forget about it? YOLO?
// *wait until disaster happens*
Say bye bye to
- the temptation of typescript?
- functions going out of control
- assertions-bloat inside functions
- complaining about javascript not being
- unsafe nested datastructures
- verbose unittests doing typesafe stuff
Recover from errors:
The typeshave.error(errors)
function is triggered in case of errors, you can define your own like so:
typeshave.error = (errors) => {
console.error(errors)
return new Error(errors)
}
What about type-safe nested structures?
Passing around big-ass nested data? You better police that data upfront:
schema = {
type: "object",
properties:{
foo: { type: "string", regex: /abc/, required:true },
bar: { type: "integer", minimum: 0, maximum: 100 },
records:{
type: "array",
required:true,
items: {
type:"object",
properties: {
name: { type: "string", minLength: 2 },
age: { type: "integer" }
}
}
},
cbs: { type: "array", items: { type: "function", required :true } }
}
function foo = typesafe( schema, ( data ) => {
console.log "valid data passed!"
# do something with data
}
Then obviously at some point this happens:
Well not anymore with typeshave :)
Usecases
- REST payloads
- payment transaction payloads
- objects which represent configs or options
- datastructures and resultsets for html-rendering or processing
In the browser
<script src="typeshave.min.js"></script>
<script>
typeshave = require("typeshave").typesafe;
var foo = typeshave({
foo: { type: "string" },
bar: { type: "boolean" }
}, function(foo,bar){
alert("ok data passed!");
});
foo( "string", true );
</script>
Manual validation
Manual validation is always at your fingertips as well:
var typeshave = require('typeshave)
var validate = typeshave.validate
var foo = function(foo,bar)
validate( arguments, { // throws exception in case of error
foo: { type: "string" },
bar: { type: "boolean" }
});
// do stuff with data
The example uses
arguments
as input, but passing an object would work as well.