typeorm-relations-graphql
v3.0.0
Published
A helper to join TypeORM relations based on fields selected in a GraphQL query.
Downloads
834
Readme
Automatically determine the entity relationships that must be JOIN
ed in a TypeORM query to satisfy nested object
fields selected by a client in a GraphQL query.
Can be used as a potentially higher performance alternative to the DataLoader pattern.
Installation
npm i typeorm-relations-graphql
This library is written in TypeScript, so type definitions are included in the box.
Your project must also install the following as peer dependencies (you should have them already):
Note: typeorm v0.3.0 changed the way relations and data sources work. If you are still using typeorm v0.2.x, please install typeorm-graphql-joiner@^1 and read the usage instructions for that version.
Introduction
When your GraphQL server is backed by TypeORM entities, you may have object relationships like the following example:
{
// Product entity
"product": {
"id": "1234",
"name": "Some product",
// nested Owner entity
"owner": {
"id": "4321",
"name": "Some owner"
}
}
}
Let's say product
corresponds to a Product
entity in TypeORM, and it has a
many-to-one relationship to an Owner
entity defined on the
product.owner
property. In your database, you have a table for each of these entities.
Now you want to expose Product
as an object in your GraphQL schema with the same relationship. You could simply
resolve product.owner
using a database query to fetch the related Owner
object, but if you create a GraphQL resolver
that returns a list of n products then your server will need to perform n + 1 database queries to fully resolve it.
This problem multiplies exponentially as your schema grows more complex and you have levels of nested relationships.
typeorm-relations-graphql can help here by optimizing these relationships into SQL JOIN
s. Instead of fetching the
product
and then each owner
individually, it enables you to fetch the product
with all requested relationships
in a single database query by making use of TypeORM's relations
option on find
methods.
So in this simple example, instead of your resolvers producing this SQL:
SELECT * FROM product;
SELECT * FROM owner WHERE product_id = :x;
SELECT * FROM owner WHERE product_id = :y;
SELECT * FROM owner WHERE product_id = :z;
You can optimize it to:
SELECT * FROM product LEFT JOIN owner ON product.id = owner.product_id;
The value of this optimization increases as you have greater levels of nesting, of course.
You could join these relations manually (or eagerly) with TypeORM, but then you are likely to end up overfetching - retrieving relations that were not requested by the client and producing SQL that is more expensive than necessary. typeorm-relations-graphql only joins relations that were requested in the client's GQL query.
You could also use a DataLoader to batch requests, but this will usually still result in more database queries than are produced by joining relations. Beware however that large joins with many levels of nesting can be bad for performance, too, so you may need to mix approaches.
Usage
First, create a GraphRelationBuilder
instance, passing in a TypeORM DataSource
object (which provides access to
entity metadata):
import { GraphRelationBuilder } from 'typeorm-relations-graphql';
import { dataSource } from './datasource';
const graphRelationBuilder = new GraphRelationBuilder(dataSource);
Inside a GraphQL query resolver (where you have a GraphQLResolveInfo
object available) you can use
GraphRelationBuilder
to determine the relations you need to join to fulfill the query.
The build
and buildForQuery
methods of GraphRelationBuilder
return a RelationMap
instance. This is a class
provided by the typeorm-relations package and contains methods that
you can use to manipulate the relations before passing them to TypeORM. Read the
typeorm-relations documentation to learn more about it.
GraphRelationBuilder
buildForQuery(entity: Constructor<Entity>, info: GraphQLResolveInfo): RelationMap<Entity>
Builds a RelationMap
for an entity class by mapping from the root of the GraphQL query.
The entity
passed in should be an entity class constructor (not an instance of the entity).
For example, if you have a products
query in your GQL schema which returns a list of Product
entities (where the
Product
entity and Product
GQL object type are equivalent), you can simply map Product
relations in this way:
import { GraphQLResolveInfo } from 'graphql';
import { dataSource } from './datasource';
// Example resolver function for a "products" query in your GQL schema
function products(source: any, args: any, context: any, info: GraphQLResolveInfo): Promise<Product[]> {
const graphRelationBuilder = new GraphRelationBuilder(dataSource);
const productRelationMap = graphRelationBuilder.buildForQuery(Product, info);
return dataSource.getRepository(Product).find({
relations: productRelationMap.toFindOptionsRelations(),
});
}
In this example if your Product
entity has an owner
property that relates to another entity, and the owner
field
is selected by the client's GraphQL query, then calling toFindOptionsRelations()
will produce:
{
owner: true
}
Or, if owner
contains an additional relationship to an address
entity which is also selected by the client, you can
get a nested structure like:
{
owner: {
address: true
}
}
buildForQuery(entity: Constructor<Entity>, info: GraphQLResolveInfo, path: string): RelationMap<Entity>
In some cases you may need to map relations to entity fields where the GQL object type for the entity is not the root
node in the query. A common example of this is in a mutation which returns a payload object containing the modified
object rather than the object directly. In this case you can pass a path
string as the last argument to
buildForQuery
:
import { GraphQLResolveInfo } from 'graphql';
import { dataSource } from './datasource';
// Example resolver function for a "createProduct" mutation in your GQL schema
async function createProduct(
source: any,
args: any,
context: any,
info: GraphQLResolveInfo,
): Promise<CreateProductPayload> {
const graphRelationBuilder = new GraphRelationBuilder(dataSource);
// Create the new product
const product: Product = await dataSource.getRepository(Product).save(
dataSource.getRepository(Product).create({
name: 'New Product',
}),
);
// Create payload and re-fetch the new product to retrieve all requested relations
const payload: CreateProductPayload = {
success: true,
product: await dataSource.getRepository(Product).findOneOrFail({
where: { id: product.id },
relations: graphRelationBuilder.buildForQuery(Product, info, 'product').toFindOptionsRelations(),
}),
};
return payload;
}
A GraphQL query for this mutation might look like:
mutation {
createProduct {
success
product {
id
name
owner {
id
name
}
}
}
}
The Product
entity here exists below the root level of the object being resolved (createProduct
), at a field called
product
. So the path 'product'
must be given to buildForQuery
.
Dotted path notation can be used when the entity is at an even lower level in the node tree. For example, the path
'product.owner'
could be used to map the Owner
entity in this example.
build(entity: Constructor<Entity>, baseNode: SelectionNode, fragments?: Record<string, FragmentDefinitionNode>): GraphRelationBuilder<Entity>
This method works like buildForQuery
(and is called by it internally), but it can operate on an arbitrary
SelectionNode
rather than requiring an entire GraphQLResolveInfo
object.
If your GQL for the selection may contain named fragments, the definition of those fragments must be passed through.
The required data can be retrieved from the fragments
property on the top level GraphQLResolveInfo
object.
License
MIT