npm package discovery and stats viewer.

Discover Tips

  • General search

    [free text search, go nuts!]

  • Package details

    pkg:[package-name]

  • User packages

    @[username]

Sponsor

Optimize Toolset

I’ve always been into building performant and accessible sites, but lately I’ve been taking it extremely seriously. So much so that I’ve been building a tool to help me optimize and monitor the sites that I build to make sure that I’m making an attempt to offer the best experience to those who visit them. If you’re into performant, accessible and SEO friendly sites, you might like it too! You can check it out at Optimize Toolset.

About

Hi, 👋, I’m Ryan Hefner  and I built this site for me, and you! The goal of this site was to provide an easy way for me to check the stats on my npm packages, both for prioritizing issues and updates, and to give me a little kick in the pants to keep up on stuff.

As I was building it, I realized that I was actually using the tool to build the tool, and figured I might as well put this out there and hopefully others will find it to be a fast and useful way to search and browse npm packages as I have.

If you’re interested in other things I’m working on, follow me on Twitter or check out the open source projects I’ve been publishing on GitHub.

I am also working on a Twitter bot for this site to tweet the most popular, newest, random packages from npm. Please follow that account now and it will start sending out packages soon–ish.

Open Software & Tools

This site wouldn’t be possible without the immense generosity and tireless efforts from the people who make contributions to the world and share their work via open source initiatives. Thank you 🙏

© 2024 – Pkg Stats / Ryan Hefner

ts-get

v1.0.5

Published

Alternative to lodash.get that makes it typed and cool as if optional chaining proposal is there

Downloads

2,316

Readme

ts-get

npm version Build Status codecov

Alternative to lodash.get that makes it typed and cool as if optional chaining proposal is there.

Means you're not only safely navigate object, but you're also getting 100% autocomplete and type-safeness 🎉

Usage and examples

import get from 'ts-get'

 type SomeType = {
  optionalField?: string
  nested?: {
    dangerousAccess?: string
  }
 } | undefined | null
 
 const emptyObject: SomeType = {}
 const withOneOptionalField: SomeType = {
    optionalField: "value",
 }
 
 get(emptyObject, it => it.optionalField, "default") // -> "default"
 get(withOneOptionalField, it => it.optionalField, "default") // -> "value"
 get(withOneOptionalField, it => it.nested.dangerousAccess, "default") // -> "default"
 get(withOneOptionalField, it => it.unknownField, "default") // -> Type error, `unknownField` doesn't exist on type
 get(withOneOptionalField, it => it.optionalField, 5) // -> Type error, third argument is not assignable to type `string`

Difference with lodash.get behavior

  • If your path gets null at the end, it will bail out to defaultValue or undefined. If you would like to get null returned anyway, just pass it as a defaultValue

Known issues/limitations:

  • If your type field is of type null and only null or undefined your field will be of type {}[]. I have no idea how to fix it 🤷‍♂️ PR Welcome 😇🙏
type A = {
  field: null | undefined// -> {}[] inside of the callback and as return type too
}
  • If you return not a primitive but an object, all its nested fields will be Required e.g. all undefined and null will be removed.
import get from 'ts-get'
type A = {
  field?: {
    optional?: string | null
  }
}
const input: A = {}
const res = get(input, it => it.field)
res // <== Will be inferred as { optional: string }, without null and ? (undefined) which is wrong, but seems to be impossible to infer.

You can solve this issue passing down generics implicitly

import get from 'ts-get'
type A = {
  field?: {
    optional?: string | null
  }
}
const input: A = {}
const res = get<A, A['field']>(input, it => it.field)
res // <== Will be inferred properly