scslre
v0.3.0
Published
A library to find JS RegExp with super-linear worst-case time complexity for attack strings that repeat a single character.
Downloads
2,516,213
Maintainers
Readme
Single-character super-linear RegExps
what a name...
A library to find JS RegExp with super-linear worst-case time complexity for attack strings that repeat a single character.
The static analysis method implemented by this library focuses on finding attack string tuples where a single character is repeated. This major limitation allows the library to be fast while also offering decent support for backreferences and assertions.
This library is not intended as a full static analysis to guard against super-linear worst-case time complexity. It is meant to be as a supplementary analysis on top of existing general analysis methods that don't (or don't fully) support advanced regex features, or as a lightweight analysis on top of existing full (but heavyweight) analysis methods. Libraries that provide such general or near-full analysis are known as recheck and vuln-regex-detector. You may consider using these libraries as well.
Usage
This library exports only a single function, analyse
, which takes a RegExp literal and returns a list of reports that show the quantifiers causing super-linear worst-case time complexity.
Documentation
For more information on the exact inputs and outputs of each function, see the full API documentation.
Limitations
Analysis
This library is implemented using a very limited static analysis method that can only find attack strings where a single character is repeated. Attack strings are generated from a tuple (x,y,z) such that every string s = xynz (or x + y.repeat(n) + z
for JS folks) takes O(np) or O(2n) many steps to reject, p>1. This analysis method can only find tuples where y is a single character. E.g. the polynomial backtracking in /^(ab)*(ab)*$/
for (x,y,z) = ("", "ab", "c") cannot be detected by this library because y is not a single character.
However, this limitation allows the static analysis method to be quick and to provide good (but not perfect) support for backreferences and assertions (e.g. \b
, (?<!ba+)
).
False negatives
The analysis method primarily searches for polynomial backtracking. Finds of exponential backtracking are only a byproduct. Because of this, not all causes of super-linear worst-case time complexity are found.
False positives
This library doesn't actually search for the whole tuple (x,y,z); it only searches for y and assumes that adequate values for x and z can be found. A single-character approximation of the suffix z will be computed and accounted for but false positives are still possible.
Reports
There are 3 different types of reports that each indicate a different type of cause for the super-linear worst-case time complexity. All are explained in the documentation of their types.
Exponential backtracking
While most reports show polynomial backtracking, some report exponential backtracking. Exponential backtracking is a lot more dangerous and can easily be exploited for ReDoS attacks.
While other reports may be dismissed, all reports of exponential backtracking must be fixed.
All reports with exponential: true
report exponential backtracking.