react-server-only-context
v1.0.0
Published
A solution for enabling context sharing in React Server Components, providing an alternative to React.createContext.
Downloads
205
Maintainers
Readme
react-server-only-context
react-server-only-context
is a straightforward alternative for using context
within React Server Components. Since React Server Components do not include built-in context
support, this package provides a simple and broadly applicable solution for sharing state across server-side components without resorting to prop drilling.
Installation
To install via npm:
npm install react-server-only-context
Or with pnpm:
pnpm install react-server-only-context
Quick Start
First, create a context using createServerOnlyContext
.
import { createServerOnlyContext } from 'react-server-only-context'
export const Context = createServerOnlyContext('defaultValue')
Next, use the Context.Provider
to wrap your components, passing in a value
prop.
<Context.Provider value="newValue">
<YourComponent />
</Context.Provider>
Lastly, use readContext
where you need to access the context value.
import { readContext } from 'react-server-only-context'
import { Context } from './YourContext'
const value = readContext(Context)
API
createServerOnlyContext(defaultValue)
Creates a context with a default value. The defaultValue
is the initial value for the context.
This function returns an object that includes a Provider
component.
Provider
The Provider
component is used to pass a value down the component tree. It accepts two props:
value
: The value to be passed down.children
: The child components.
The Provider
is part of the object returned by createServerOnlyContext
.
readContext(context)
This function accepts a context (created by createServerOnlyContext
) as its argument and returns the current value of the context.
Pitfalls
Before the introduction of React Server Components, component traversal in React was depth-first, implying a stack-like process. Consider the following component structure:
<>
<Component name="A">
<Component name="D">
<Component name="G" />
<Component name="H" />
</Component>
<Component name="E" />
</Component>
<Component name="B" />
<Component name="C">
<Component name="F" />
</Component>
</>
For client-side React rendering, the traversal order of the code above is:
A
D
G
H
E
B
C
F
However, with React Server Components — specifically when using asynchronous components — the traversal order changes to:
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
The asynchronous components that can suspend create an impression of breadth-first traversal, as stated in the React Server Components RFCs: "if any Server Component suspends, React will pause rendering of that subtree" (React RFCs).
This shift means that traditional React context behavior, based on a stack model (LIFO), cannot be replicated with asynchronous components. Consider this example using client-side components and React.createContext
:
<Context.Provider value={{ value: 1 }}>
<Component name="A">
<Context.Provider value={{ value: 2 }}>
<Component name="D">
<Context.Provider value={{ value: 3 }}>
<Component name="G" />
<Component name="H" />
</Context.Provider>
</Component>
</Context.Provider>
<Component name="E" />
</Component>
<Component name="B" />
<Component name="C">
<Component name="F" />
</Component>
</Context.Provider>
In this setup, components retrieve values from the context as follows:
A => 1
D => 2
G => 3
H => 3
E => 1
B => 1
C => 1
F => 1
However, with react-server-only-context
and asynchronous React Server Components, the outcomes become unpredictable since the stack model cannot be implemented in asynchronous components. The expected context values might differ:
A => 1
D => 2
G => 3
H => 3
E => 2
B => 1
C => 1
F => 2
react-server-only-context
offers a basic solution for data sharing within React Server Components, but due to these differences, its behavior cannot fully align with React.createContext
.
Contributing
Contributions are welcome via GitHub issues and pull requests.
License
This project is licensed under the MIT License. See the LICENSE file for more details.