react-formagic
v0.3.2
Published
React immutable two-way binding helper HoC
Downloads
17
Maintainers
Readme
react-formagic
A react form binding that adapts to your code, not the other way around.
Example
Please visit example branch of this repo. More examples are coming...
Usage/API
At the end of the day, react-formagic
is just a HoC wrapper that translates props given to it into a set of enhanced props that'll make it easy to work with forms.
formagic(propsToPrxy, subscriber, [options])
function propsToPrxy(props) => Object
A selector function that converts selected props into a set of proxied
props, upon whose change subscriber
will automatically be called with the entire updated data tree.
Please note that the return value MUST be an object, as react-formagic
needs to be able to walk through the tree.
function subscriber(newState, [props]) => null
A subscriber function that will be called each time a leaf value is updated. newState
is the entire data tree, rather than only the changed value.
newState
signature is the same as what propsToPrxy
will select.
The second argument will pass any given props to formagic HoC, allowing you to pass in any post processors, such as dispatch
.
object options
boolean transclude
: defaults tofalse
. Determines whether to override originally given props with the reactive data tree.If set to
false
,react-formagic
will namespace the reactive data tree underformagic
.
Binding your form elements to formagic
You have 2 choices. They are exactly the same, so choose what you prefer. Obviously you have more control going with the first option. :P
Have a look at this for a working React component example.
render() {
const { myData } = this.props;
return (
// yes, just replace your data.
// formagic will recalculate your entire tree, and pass the newly created persistent state
// through your subscriber
<input value={your.data} type="text" onChange={(ev) => { your.data = ev.target.value; }}/>
);
}
More of 'how it works' stuff
A bit of history
I don't know if it's just me, but handling form data with one-way data flow has been a massive headache for me. Mainly because onChange
listeners on form elements will only ever give you the changed leaf data, and you'd have to have a matching reducer or a store updater that knows how to translate that partial change to the data source.
If you by any bad chance have a deeply nested data structure, you have to be VERY clever about your actions/store updaters, or just... write as many action/store updaters as all partial change can ever occur.
I tried to use other React form libraries, but it felt as if I am adding a lot of code just to make forms work, to a level I feel enforced to write codes in a certain way, just for a goddamn form!
Then I tried the great vue (if you haven't you should really try it). You know, two-way libraries are just so much of a relief when it comes to dealing with forms. But At that time I was already managing quite a collection of redux actions/reducers I was reluctant to change, so I decided to give it a try and glue vue and Redux together.
I discovered this one trait: vue
would have updated the data source before onChange
events will have fired - you could have the updated data source without doing anything, and you could simply pass that data source to any onChange
function. Easy!
I've come back to React world since then (team problem), but thought hey why not give it a try. Hence react-formagic
.
You can read this document about vue
's reactivity mechanism.
Immutable reactivity to rescue
react-formagic
will walk through the data tree and replace each all leaf values with reactive getter/setter using Object.defineProperty
. The setter will first update the original value, then subsequently call subscriber
with the updated data tree.
...What does it mean? It means you already have the fully updated data tree even before your data hits your store through reducer or whatever flux store updater. Since we have the entire data tree, all we have to do is to replace the source data as a whole, like this.
So yes, it's kind of two-way. But it is only kind of two-way because how the updated data should be applied to your store is left to you. The data flow terminates at subscriber
, so you can explicitly further modify it before handing it to an action.
This walk process is at most O(n)
, and runs every single time the selected props are updated. Inevitably the initial walk will have to iterate through all nodes in your data, but from then, it'd only recalculate what's changed, using structural sharing
.
Disclaimer
This project is still in its PoC stage. If you'd like to see how it works, please visit the example page.
TODO
- tests
- optimisation (tail calls and stuff)
- npm publish
- human readable README
LICENSE
MIT