ramdash
v0.0.5
Published
(Some) missing lodash functions for ramda.
Downloads
9
Maintainers
Readme
ramdash v0.0.5
(Some) lodash missing functions in ramda.
This project is considered an early alpha as it's covering only a small subset of lodash functions and their compatibility isn't perfect in edge cases.
Motivation
Ramda is great for composing and mapping over things the FP way, but _.each(things, (thing)=>....)
feels a lot more natural than _.each(thing =>...., things)
.
R.flip
partially solves this, cause still you will not be receiving (value, index, list)
but just the value. R.addIndex
solves this, but you can see its getting too much of an annoyance, just for a bloody loop.
Also in R.forEach
you can't iterate over Objects (as of December 2016, although its coming with a separate function with the longish name forEachObjIndexed
).
So _.each
was motivation number one - it works just like lodash (missing only the breaking of loop when iterator returns false).
In general, many iterator functions in Ramda accept only a list
(i.e []
) whereas in lodash they accept a collection (i.e []
or {}
). We have to adapt, but till then, some convenience please :-)
Also lodash has the convenient _.mapValues
and _.mapKeys
so these are transferred over.
There are some other nasty incompatibilties which I am hoping to cross over - please open an issue/PR if you want something added/changed.
In overall, its not meant to replace ramda's existing functions which should be preferred, since you 've decided to make the ramda
leap anyway!
Lodash functions supported
_.each
like lodash, iterate over arrays and objects (and strings), passing(val, idxOrKey, collection)
to iterator. NOT SUPPORTED is the breaking of the loop whenfalse
is returned by iterator._.reduce
like lodash, supporting the defaultaccumulator
as the first item of the array. Objects are NOT SUPPORTED, it currently works only with arrays._.map
like lodash's, along with thepluck
/_.property
iteratee shorthand when iterator is a string._.mapValues
like lodash_.mapKeys
like lodash_.isEmpty
like lodash, solving nasty Ramda incompatibilities forundefined
,null
,RegExp
,Number
, newString('')
and emptyNodeList
, which aren't considered empty in Ramda :-(_.assign
like lodash
In iterating cases the Ramda forEach
is used internally, so be aware of its caveats (it does not skip deleted or unassigned indices on sparse arrays).
Usage:
Since it has NO dependency directly on ramda
, you have to provide it so it can be injected - i.e:
var R = require('ramda);
var _ = require('ramdash')(R);
If you have a custom R / requiring only specific modules, you need to pass an R
like object with these keys at least:
forEach
reduce
keys
type
isEmpty
equals
is
License
The MIT License (MIT)
Copyright(c) 2016 Angelos Pikoulas ([email protected])
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.