proj.js
v0.9.0
Published
PROJ bindings for JavaScript - with a native port for Node.js and a WASM port for the browser
Downloads
112
Maintainers
Readme
proj.js
This is proj.js
- PROJ
bindings for JavaScript with a native port for Node.js and WASM port for the browser using SWIG JSE.
This project is completely separate from proj4js
which is a separate (and partial) reimplementation in JavaScript.
Current status
Alpha quality. Most basic functions work as intended. Mostly tested for leaks on the nominal code paths.
Keep in mind that I am only a very occasional user of a very small fraction of PROJ
and my main interest is JavaScript bindings - Node.js and browser - for C/C++ projects. If you find methods that are not usable in the current version and submit unit tests for it, I will make them work.
Try it yourself
# Checkout from git
git clone https://github.com/mmomtchev/proj.js.git
# Install all the npm dependencies
cd proj.js
npm install
npx xpm install
# If you do not have SWIG JSE installed, download the SWIG generated files
# from a recent GHA run: https://github.com/mmomtchev/proj.js/actions
# (download swig-generated and unzip it in proj.js/swig)
mkdir -p swig && cd swig && unzip ~/Downloads/swig-generated.zip
# If you have SWIG JSE installed, generate the wrappers yourself
npm run swig
# Build the native version (requires a working C++ compiler)
npm run build:native
# Build the WASM version (requires emsdk in path)
npm run build:wasm
# Alternatively, get the compiled binaries from a recent GHA run
mkdir -p lib/binding && cd lib/binding && unzip -x ~/Downloads/native-ubuntu-latest-tiff.zip && unzip -x ~/Downloads/wasm-external-no_tiff.zip
# Run the tests (Node.js and browser)
npm test
# Run the web demo (should work on all OS if you have the WASM version)
cd test/browser && npx webpack serve --mode=production
# then open http://localhost:8030/
Usage
This package is a magickwand.js
-style npm
package with an automatic import that resolves to either the native module or the WASM module depending on the environment.
The following code will import the module:
import qPROJ from 'proj.js';
const PROJ = await qPROJ;
console.log(`proj.db is inlined: ${PROJ.proj_js_inline_projdb}`);
if (!PROJ.proj_js_inline_projdb) {
const proj_db = new Uint8Array(await (await fetch(proj_db_url)).arrayBuffer());
PROJ.loadDatabase(proj_db);
}
Node.js will pick up the native binary, while a modern bundler such as webpack
or rollup
with support for Node.js 16 exports will pick up the WASM module.
This requires ES6, Node.js 16 and a recent webpack
or rollup
. If using TypeScript, you will have to transpile to ES6. Most major web components were updated with those features in 2022.
If importing in a legacy CJS environment, you will be limited to using the native module in Node.js only:
const PROJ = require('proj.js/native');
console.log(`proj.db is inlined: ${PROJ.proj_js_inline_projdb}`);
When using the native module, proj.db
is always external and automatically loaded from require.resolve('proj.js/lib/binding/proj/proj.db')
.
If using TypeScript, you will need to explicitly import the types in the PROJ
namespace because PROJ
is a variable:
import qPROJ from 'proj.js';
import type * as PROJ from 'proj.js';
const PROJ = await qPROJ;
console.log(`proj.db is inlined: ${PROJ.proj_js_inline_projdb}`);
if (!PROJ.proj_js_inline_projdb) {
const proj_db = new Uint8Array(await (await fetch(proj_db_url)).arrayBuffer());
PROJ.loadDatabase(proj_db);
}
WASM size considerations
When using WASM, proj.db
can either be inlined in the WASM bundle or it can be loaded from an Uint8Array
before use.
Currently, the bundle size remains an issue.
| Component | raw | brotli | brotli
| --- | --- | --- |
| proj.wasm
w/ TIFF w/o proj.db
| 8593K | 1735K |
| proj.wasm
w/o TIFF w/o proj.db
| 7082K | 1302K |
| proj.db
| 9240K | 1320K |
It should be noted that while using -Os
in emscripten
can lead to a two-fold reduction of the raw size, the size of the compressed build will always remain the same. Sames goes for optimizing with binaryen
- despite the very significant raw size gain, the compressed size gain is relatively insignificant.
curl
support is enabled only in the native build - there is no simple solution to networking for the WASM build.
Linking with my own sqlite-wasm-http
project to access a remote proj.db
, using SQL over HTTP, is a very significant project that will further increase the bundle size to the point nullifying the gains from proj.db
. It does not seem to be a logical option at the moment.
Currently the biggest contributor to raw code size is SWIG JSE which produces large amounts of identical code for each function. This may me improved in a future version, but bear in mind that SWIG-generated code has the best compression ratio. It is also worth investigating what can be gained from modularization of the SWIG wrappers and if it is really necessary to wrap separately all derived classes.
Performance
Initial crude benchmarks, tested on i7 9700K @ 3.6 GHz with the C++ quickstart:
| Test | Native | WASM in V8 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| DatabaseContext.create()
| 0.171ms | 16.316ms |
| AuthorityFactory.create('string')
| 0.071ms | 0.44ms |
| CoordinateOperationContext.create()
| 0.052ms | 0.397ms |
| AuthorityFactory.create('EPSG')
| 0.011ms | 0.274ms |
| createFromUserInput()
| 0.283ms | 0.617ms |
| CoordinateOperationFactory.create().createOperations()
| 0.588ms | 1.885ms |
| coordinateTransformer()
| 0.29ms | 19.117ms |
| transform()
| 0.014ms | 0.234ms |
Globally, the first impression is that the library is usable both on the backend and in the browser in fully synchronous mode. The only real hurdle at the moment remains the WASM bundle size.