postcss-nesting
v13.0.1
Published
Nest rules inside each other in CSS
Downloads
25,736,963
Readme
PostCSS Nesting
npm install postcss-nesting --save-dev
PostCSS Nesting lets you nest style rules inside each other, following the CSS Nesting specification.
If you want nested rules the same way Sass works you might want to use PostCSS Nested instead.
.foo {
color: red;
&:hover {
color: green;
}
> .bar {
color: blue;
}
@media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) {
color: cyan;
}
color: pink;
}
/* becomes */
.foo {
color: red;
}
.foo:hover {
color: green;
}
.foo > .bar {
color: blue;
}
@media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) {
.foo {
color: cyan;
}
}
.foo {
color: pink;
}
Usage
Add PostCSS Nesting to your project:
npm install postcss postcss-nesting --save-dev
Use it as a PostCSS plugin:
const postcss = require('postcss');
const postcssNesting = require('postcss-nesting');
postcss([
postcssNesting(/* pluginOptions */)
]).process(YOUR_CSS /*, processOptions */);
Options
edition
The CSS nesting feature has gone through several iterations and what is currently implemented in browsers is not the same as what was originally proposed. This plugin dates back to the original proposal and you might have written your CSS expecting this older behavior.
You can pick the older behavior by setting the edition
option.
The edition
values correspond with rough dates when of a particular version of the specification:
2024-02
(default)2021
[!TIP] If you wrote nested rules with
@nest
you definitely want to set theedition
to2021
.
If you are unsure than you should try to omit theedition
option and use the default.
Eventually we will remove support for the older edition, and this plugin option, so it is strongly advised to update your CSS to the latest edition.
postcssNesting({
edition: '2024-02'
})
2024-02
(default)
- usage of
:is()
pseudo-class is no longer optional - at rules are not combined with the
and
keyword @nest
is removed from the specification- declarations and nested rules/at-rules are no longer re-ordered
2021
This version is a continuation of what existed before CSS nesting was implemented in browsers.
It made a few non-invasive changes to keep up with implementations but it is falling behind.
.foo {
color: red;
&:hover {
color: green;
}
> .bar {
color: blue;
}
@media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) {
color: cyan;
}
color: pink;
}
/* becomes */
.foo {
color: red;
color: pink;
}
.foo:hover {
color: green;
}
.foo > .bar {
color: blue;
}
@media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) {
.foo {
color: cyan;
}
}
noIsPseudoSelector (edition: 2021
)
Specificity
Before :
#alpha,
.beta {
&:hover {
order: 1;
}
}
After without the option :
postcssNesting()
:is(#alpha,.beta):hover {
order: 1;
}
.beta:hover
has specificity as if .beta
where an id selector, matching the specification.
After with the option :
postcssNesting({
noIsPseudoSelector: true
})
#alpha:hover, .beta:hover {
order: 1;
}
.beta:hover
has specificity as if .beta
where a class selector, conflicting with the specification.
Complex selectors
Before :
.alpha > .beta {
& + & {
order: 2;
}
}
After without the option :
postcssNesting()
:is(.alpha > .beta) + :is(.alpha > .beta) {
order: 2;
}
After with the option :
postcssNesting({
noIsPseudoSelector: true
})
.alpha > .beta + .alpha > .beta {
order: 2;
}
this is a different selector than expected as .beta + .alpha
matches .beta
followed by .alpha
.
avoid these cases when you disable :is()
writing the selector without nesting is advised here
/* without nesting */
.alpha > .beta + .beta {
order: 2;
}