npm-missing-link
v0.0.2
Published
The missing link to npm link
Downloads
7
Maintainers
Readme
📦🔗 npm-missing-link
📦🔗
npm-missing-link
is the missing link for npm link
.
npm-missing-link
will link only specific folders within your project and only the needed node_modules.
Table of Contents
Install
npm i --save-dev npm-missing-link
Usage
Configuration
In your package.json you'll need to add two scripts
"scripts:" {
"link": "node_modules/.bin/npm-missing-link",
"unlink": "node_modules/.bin/npm-missing-unlink"
}
Add a configuration file as described by cosmiconfig
with this shape:
{
// If you have script that watches & re-builds on change - you should specify it here.
"watch": {
// Whether or not to execute the watch after linking is done.
"executeOnLink": true,
// The script execute to watch & re-build on change.
"script": "npm run watch"
},
// A list of custom paths to link
"customDirectories": [
{
// The path you want to be linked.
"path": "es",
// In case the above path doesn't exist, running the "build" script should create it so it could be linked.
"build": "npm run build"
},
{
"path": "dist",
"build": "npm run dist"
}
]
}
Linking
Then, whenever you want, link your package somewhere else by running:
npm run link -- path/to/another/app/using/your/package
If your package has a watch
script, you can run it now - unless you specified executeOnLink: true
, in which case it'll automatically run.
Your app is linked successfully to your package! changes should be reflected instantly ⚡️ !
Done working? don't need the link anymore? want to go back to the previous state? no problem!
npm run unlink -- path/to/another/app/using/your/package
Simple as that!
Why?
npm link
is good in concept, but doesn't follow the npm installation algorithm.
npm link
works by simply creating a symlink from your package to the node_modules of the app using it, so all the node_modules "go a long" with your package.
That's not how the installation algorithm works in the real world, that next level of node_modules is only added if there's a version conflict from another package the consuming app is installing.
That's a problem because when using npm link
it won't reflect the actual state the consuming app is going to be in when installing your package.
Example time!
Let's assume we have a pacakge called ju-jitsu
and an app called thomas-anderson
.
This would be a part of the package.json
defined by thomas-anderson
:
"depenencies": {
"kick": "^1.0.0",
"punch": "^1.2.0",
"ju-jitsu": "1.0.0",
}
This would be a part of the package.json
defined by ju-jitsu
:
"depenencies": {
"kick": "^1.0.0",
"punch": "^2.0.0",
}
And this would be the initial folder strucutre
ju-jitsu
|
|____ node_modules
| |____ kick
| |____ punch
|
|____ es
| |
| |____ index.js
|
|____ src
|
|____ index.js
thomas-anderson
|
|____ node_modules
|
|____ kick
|____ punch
|____ ju-jitsu
Now you want to add features to ju-jitsu
, but you want to make sure these changes play nicely with thomas-anderson
.
What happens when you use npm link
?
thomas-anderson
|
|____ node_modules
|
|____ kick
|____ punch
|____ ju-jitsu (symlinked)
|
|____ node_modules
| |
| |____ kick
| |____ punch
|
|____ es
| |
| |____ index.js
|
|____ src
|
|____ index.js
This means that the module resolution from files under the ju-jitsu
folder at this point would favor all the modules defined in ju-jitsu/node_modules
folder because they are more "specific".
What happens when you use npm-missing-link
?
thomas-anderson
|
|____ node_modules
|
|____ kick
|____ punch
|____ ju-jitsu
|
|____ node_modules
| |
| |____ punch (symlinked)
|
|____ es (symlinked)
|
|____ index.js
As you can see it's only linking the things you need (src
is the pre-compiled code so you don't need it) and only the node_modules that will actually be installed (kick
version matches between thomas-anderson
and ju-jitsu
)
This type of linking is much closer to the way npm i --save ju-jitsu
would be - making the testing you make at this point much more realistic.
npm-missing-link
& React
Still not convinced you need this? Are you a React
Component(s) package maintainer? If you do then you probably do need this.
React
can't function properly when there are two versions of itself in the same app managing the same parts of the DOM.
It would probably only happen when someone wants to npm link
your package to their app.
That would link all the node_modules including react
and react-dom
.
You, as a package maintainer, need them to be in devDependencies
so you could test in development but in production they shouldn't be installed and just requested using peerDependencies
.
Because npm-missing-link
links only the modules defined in dependencies
this will never happen. There will never be two versions of react
/react-dom
, even if you link in development.
Contributing
Issues & Pull Requests are highly welcome!
License
MIT