ngx-observable-input

This small repository provides ObservableInput decorator to use Angular component input attributes as RxJS Observables.

Angular AOT compiler support from version 2.0.0

Changelog

Look for changes in CHANGELOG.md file.

Why

There are many threads on Angular developer forums about treating input as observable streams. Instead of manually checking the changes in ngOnChanges hook this library provides a simple addition to @Input() decorator that does all the magic behind the scenes.

Usage

Install the library:

npm install ngx-observable-input

Let's say that we want to create an image-item component that takes an url as an input attribute. The parent gallery component has a currentImageUrl property that can change during runtime:

...
<image-item [url]="currentImageUrl"></image-item>

We can treat that url input as an observable in our image-item component by using @ObservableInput decorator:

import { Component } from "@angular/core";
import { ObservableInput } from "ngx-observable-input";
import { Observable } from "rxjs";

@Component({
    selector: "image-item",
    template: `<img [src]="url$ | async" />`
})
export class GalleryComponent {
    @ObservableInput() @Input("url") public url$: Observable<string>;
    ...
}

Simple as that!

Default value

Since version 3.0.0 the behavior of unused (not set) input attributes has changed. Previously the observable was undefined. Now the observable is initiated by a defaultValue argument provided to the decorator: @ObservableInput(defaultValue: any). This allows developer to safely subscribe to such observables without null-checking first.

Usage recommendation / naming convention

The @Input decorator is often used without the parameter, but when working with @ObservableInput it in most cases shouldn't. The parameter is used as an attribute name in HTML templates and if omited will use the name of the property that it decorates. It is okay for non-observable @Input but one should stick to the guidelines of observable naming convention: https://angular.io/guide/rx-library#naming-conventions-for-observables

Using this convention without @Input parameter will end in non-standard attribute name for Angular component. For example:

good:

@ObservableInput() @Input("url") public url$: Observable<string>;

where we have url attribute:

<image-item url="{{ currentImageUrl }}"></image-item>

is much more preferrable than:

bad:

@ObservableInput() @Input() public url$: Observable<string>;

where we have non-intuitive url$ attribute

<image-item url$="{{ currentImageUrl }}"></image-item>

Using @Input parameter will cause TSLint warnings with no-input-rename rule enabled.