js-base64-qb
v1.0.0
Published
Yet another Base64 transcoder in pure-JS
Downloads
5
Readme
base64.js
Yet another Base64 transcoder
Usage
In Browser
<script src="base64.js"></script>
node.js
var Base64 = require('js-base64').Base64;
es6+
import { Base64 } from 'js-base64';
npm
$ npm install --save js-base64
SYNOPSIS
Base64.encode('dankogai'); // ZGFua29nYWk=
Base64.encode('小飼弾'); // 5bCP6aO85by+
Base64.encodeURI('小飼弾'); // 5bCP6aO85by-
Base64.decode('ZGFua29nYWk='); // dankogai
Base64.decode('5bCP6aO85by+'); // 小飼弾
// note .decodeURI() is unnecessary since it accepts both flavors
Base64.decode('5bCP6aO85by-'); // 小飼弾
String Extension for ES5
if (Base64.extendString) {
// you have to explicitly extend String.prototype
Base64.extendString();
// once extended, you can do the following
'dankogai'.toBase64(); // ZGFua29nYWk=
'小飼弾'.toBase64(); // 5bCP6aO85by+
'小飼弾'.toBase64(true); // 5bCP6aO85by-
'小飼弾'.toBase64URI(); // 5bCP6aO85by-
'ZGFua29nYWk='.fromBase64(); // dankogai
'5bCP6aO85by+'.fromBase64(); // 小飼弾
'5bCP6aO85by-'.fromBase64(); // 小飼弾
}
TypeScript
TypeScript 2.0 type definition was added to the DefinitelyTyped repository.
$ npm install --save @types/js-base64
.decode()
vs .atob
(and .encode()
vs btoa()
)
Suppose you have:
var pngBase64 =
"iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAAEAAAABCAQAAAC1HAwCAAAAC0lEQVR42mNkYAAAAAYAAjCB0C8AAAAASUVORK5CYII=";
Which is a Base64-encoded 1x1 transparent PNG, DO NOT USE Base64.decode(pngBase64)
. Use Base64.atob(pngBase64)
instead. Base64.decode()
decodes to UTF-8 string while Base64.atob()
decodes to bytes, which is compatible to browser built-in atob()
(Which is absent in node.js). The same rule applies to the opposite direction.
SEE ALSO
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base64