flowfs
v5.2.1
Published
A filesystem abstraction doesn't interrupt your flow
Downloads
15
Readme
flowfs
I wrote flowfs because I could never remember the names and signatures of the fs
and related APIs, and because manipulating paths as strings is awkward and error-prone. Dealing with files was always a point where I would be knocked out of the zone by having to refer to docs, and run throwaway tests to make sure I was doing it right.
flowfs attempts to solve these issues by exposing an intuitive API that represents files as objects. Navigation between nodes is via properties; for example, if you're implementing an "include" directive for a template language and need to calculate a relative path -- instead of this:
// old, bad, awkward, error-prone, annoying, hard-to-remember way:
const fs = require("fs");
const path = require("path");
function include (templatePath, includePath) {
let parent = fs.dirname(templatePath);
return path.resolve(parent, includePath); // or something
}
... you would do this:
// flowfs way:
const fs = require("flowfs");
function include (templatePath, includePath) {
return fs(templatePath).parent.child(includePath).path;
}
Instantiating and navigating between nodes doesn't do any IO, it just does string manipulation internally -- fs("/path/to/non-existent/file")
is perfectly valid, and is the recommended way to create new files with flowfs, for example:
await fs("/new/file").write("some data");