deep-object-assign-with-reduce
v3.0.2
Published
Minimalist deep merging of Objects with the same function signature as Object.assign()
Downloads
756
Maintainers
Readme
deep-object-assign-with-reduce
Introduction
Deep Object.assign()
written with modern, functional JavaScript. Inspired by deep-assign
and the need for a deeper Object.assign
.
No dependencies and very tiny - only ~450 bytes gzipped.
Installation
Requires Node.js 10+, which comes with npm
.
In your project directory, type:
npm install deep-object-assign-with-reduce
or
yarn add deep-object-assign-with-reduce
Changelog
3.0.0
- dropped Node 8 and 9 support. Please use2.x
if you wish to use an older version of Node.2.0.0
- dropped IE 11 support in order to dramatically reduce filesize.1.2.0
- addeddeepAssignOptions
to give more control over array and object merging1.1.0
- fixed RegExp as values, Symbols as keys. Moved to Rollup, Jest. Updated Babel.
Examples
Merge complex objects
import { deepAssign } from 'deep-object-assign-with-reduce';
deepAssign({}, { dimensions: { width: 100, height: 100 } }, { dimensions: { width: 200 } });
// -> { dimensions: { width: 200, height: 100 } }
Merge arrays
import { deepAssign } from 'deep-object-assign-with-reduce';
deepAssign({}, { numbers: [1, 2, 3] }, { numbers: [4, 5, 6] });
// -> { numbers: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] }
Custom overwriting behavior
deepAssign
merges objects and arrays by default. If you want to disable this behavior and instead overwrite objects and/or arrays, you can use deepAssignOptions
instead, which accepts an options
object as the first parameter:
import { deepAssignOptions } from 'deep-object-assign-with-reduce';
deepAssignOptions({overwriteArrays: true}, {}, { numbers: [1, 2] }, { numbers: [3, 4] });
// -> { numbers: [3, 4] }
deepAssignOptions({overwriteObjects: true}, {}, { a: { b: 1 } }, { a: { c: 2 } });
// -> { a: { c: 2 } }
Why not just use Object.assign()
or Object spread?
Where Object.assign()
works fine
Here's the motivation: the native Object.assign()
works great on its own as long as you use simple objects that are one level deep.
There's a common use case where we have some "defaults" configuration object, in which properties can be selectively overridden while retaining the remaining default properties.
Say we have some component which has default dimensions, which we want to be able to selectively override:
// Default properties to "fallback" to.
const componentDefaults = { width: 100, height: 100 };
// Selectively overrides one property.
const componentOptions = { width: 200 };
// Constructs the final options object by merging the objects.
const options = Object.assign({}, componentDefaults, componentOptions);
// -> { width: 200, height: 100 }
This works because Object.assign
will merge the simple objects together - and if the same property
(such as width
) appears in a later object, it will override the previous value. In this case the
width
in componentOptions
overrides the previously set default in componentDefaults
.
Where Object.assign()
DOESN'T work fine
If your configuration object is more complicated and contains nested objects, Object.assign()
turns out not to work so well:
const componentDefaults = { dimensions: { width: 100, height: 100 } };
const componentOptions = { dimensions: { width: 200 } };
const options = Object.assign({}, componentDefaults, componentOptions);
// -> { dimensions: { width: 200 } }
What happened to the height
property?! It turns out that the previously set dimensions
property was completely overwritten, not merged with the new dimensions
object.
Maybe we can use Object spread? But that turns out to have the same limitation with complex objects:
const objSpreadTest = { ...componentDefaults, ...componentOptions };
// -> { dimensions: { width: 200 } }
Testing
To run the test suite, simply type:
npm test
Note that I've used some of the same tests as deep-assign
in addition to my own. More
contributions are welcome!
License
MIT