circumspect
v0.1.1
Published
Set of functions to make your TypeScript/JavaScript code safer
Downloads
326
Maintainers
Readme
circumspect
circumspect
is a set of functions to make your TypeScript/JavaScript code safer. These functions include invariant
, warning
, assertNever
, and more.
Why this library exists?
There are many helpful functions that can make your code safer, such as invariant
and assertNever
. Many of these functions are available as separate npm packages (for example, invariant
). But installing a new package (and most of the time the @types
counterpart as well) for each function is not very convenient. Also, those packages generally export their functions as default exports, making VSCode auto-import not work well with them.
This library unifies the functions that make you code safer into a single place. circumspect
is a single dependency that has them all. And VSCode auto-import works as expected because all function provided by circumspect
are named exports.
Moreover, circumspect
is 100% written in TypeScript, so every function is properly typed by default. So, there's no need to install separate @types
packages.
Installation
Using yarn:
yarn add circumspect
Using npm:
npm install circumspect
API
invariant
invariant(value: unknown, message?: string): asserts value
Parameters
value: unknown
is the value that we want to ensure to be truthy.message?: string
is an optional error message that will be included in the error that is thrown when the passedvalue
is falsy. This custom error message is displayed only in development. In production, a generic error is shown instead ('Invariant violation'
) and themessage
parameter is ignored.
Return value
asserts value
which means that the function simply narrows the type ofvalue
to be truthy and doesn't return anything.
Description
invariant
ensures that the specified value
is truthy. If that's not the case, it throws an error containing the specified message
(in development only). This function properly narrows the type of value
by excluding all falsy values (e.g., null
and undefined
).
invariant
should be used whenever we have a value that could potentially be falsy, but we are confident that in a particular circumstance, the value must be truthy. That is, the fact that the value is truthy is an invariant, and if it ever happens that the value is falsy, the invariant has been violated, and thus an error must be thrown.
Since the message
argument is completely ignored in production, you might want to strip it from your code completely in production builds. To see how to do that, see the Optimizations section.
Example
declare const user: User | null | undefined;
invariant(user, 'The user is missing!');
user; // If we get here, the type is narrowed to `User`
In this example, the user
object can potentially be null
or undefined
(i.e., falsy). If that's the case, we have an invariant violation, and the invariant
function will throw. Otherwise, it simply returns and we know that user
actually points to a user object.
warning
warning(value: unknown, message: string): void
Parameters
value: unknown
is the value that we want to check. If it is falsy, a warning is issued to the console.message: string
is the warning message that will be written to the console.
Return value
void
the function doesn't return anything.
Description
warning
issues a warning to the console with the given message
if the specified value
is falsy. The warning is issued only in development. In production, this function doesn't do anything.
It should be used whenever we want to issue a development-only warning if some value is falsy, which should help guide developers to fix the non-critical issues being reported in the warning message.
Since warning
doesn't do anything in production, you might want to remove calls to this function completely from your code in production builds. To see how to do that, see the Optimizations section.
Examples
declare const mode: 'auto' | 'default' | 'slow' | 'fast';
warning(
mode !== 'auto',
'Mode "auto" has been deprecated. Please use "default" instead.',
);
In this example, we want to issue a deprecation warning if the mode
is 'auto'
. To do so, we need to pass a falsy value, that's why we pass mode !== 'auto'
, which is falsy only when the mode
is 'auto'
.
In some cases, it makes sense to pass false
directly. For example:
declare const languages: Language[];
declare const defaultLanguage: Language;
declare const langName: string;
let lang = languages.find(({ name }) => name === langName);
if (!lang) {
warning(
false,
`Language with name "${langName}" not found. Falling back to the default language.`,
);
lang = defaultLanguage;
}
assertNever
assertNever(value: never): never
Parameters
value: never
is the value after all possible union type variants have been exhausted.
Return value
never
which means that the function never returns; it just throws an error if ever actually called.
Description
assertNever
should be used to ensure that all variants of a union type have been exhausted.
If all union variants of value
have been exhausted, there is no compiler error when calling assertNever
with value
, since value
is considered to be of type never
at that point, and at run time, we never reach the point of calling assertNever
, meaning that no error will be thrown.
However, if not all union variants have been exhaused, then we are calling assertNever
with something other than never
and so there will be a compiler error saying something like
Argument of type 'x' is not assignable to parameter of type 'never'.
which we can fix by handling the missing variants. You can read more about union exhaustiveness checking and assertNever
in the TypeScript docs.
Example
declare const state: 'loading' | 'done' | 'error';
switch (state) {
case 'loading':
return <Loading />;
case 'done':
return <Done />;
case 'error':
return <Error />;
}
In this example, we handle all possible states inside the switch
statement: 'loading'
, 'done'
, and 'error'
.
However, what if in the future we add another state, such as 'pending'
?
The fact that the switch
statement is not handling 'pending'
would be undetected.
The solution is to have a default
case in which we assert that all possible states have been handled.
switch (state) {
...
default:
return assertNever(state);
}
So, when all state variants are handled, we get no compile time error. However, when we add the new 'pending'
state, we will get a compiler error saying:
Argument of type 'string' is not assignable to parameter of type 'never'.
We can fix this error by handling the 'pending'
state inside the switch
.
As you can see from this example, assertNever
is especially useful in switch
statements where we want to ensure to have handled all possible cases at all times.
nonNull
nonNull<T>(value: T | null | undefined): value is T
Parameters
value: T | null | undefined
is the value that we want to check for not beingnull
orundefined
.
Return value
value is T
which means that the function returns a boolean indicating whether the passed value is neithernull
norundefined
. This narrows the type ofvalue
toT
(i.e., excludesnull
andundefined
) whentrue
is returned.
Description
nonNull
is a predicate function that checks whether the specified value is non-null, i.e., neither null
nor undefined
. After calling the function, the type of value
is properly narrowed based on whether true
or false
was returned.
nonNull
should be used whenever we have a value that could potentially be null
, undefined
, or both and we want to check for that and have its type properly narrowed.
The name of this function stems from the NonNullable
utility type, which excludes null
and undefined
from a type.
Example
declare const names: (string | null)[];
const nonNullNames = names.filter(nonNull);
// nonNullNames has type 'string[]'
In this example, we have an array of names that can also include some null
elements. We filter the array for all non-null elements and get back a string[]
.
If we instead used names.filter(x => x !== null)
, we would get back non-null elements, but the type would still be (string | null)[]
since TypeScript sees the function that we pass to filter
as just returning a boolean
and so no type narrowing occurs.
Optimizations
We recommend using babel-plugin-dev-expression
to strip the message
argument passed to invariant
and to completely remove calls to warning
in production.
Basically, in production, babel-plugin-dev-expression
replaces
invariant(value, 'Value is falsy!');
with
if (!value) {
invariant(false);
}
so the message
argument is stripped. It also completely removes calls to warning
. So, lines like this
warning(value, 'Value is falsy!');
are removed.
Contributing
Pull requests are very welcome. If you intend to introduce a major change, please open a related issue first in which we can discuss what you would like to change.
Please make sure to update the tests and the README as appropriate.