Brefer project for Svelte 5 preprocessing

What is it?

Brefer is a preprocessor to shorten the new Svelte 5 syntax for handling reactivity (hence the name "Brefer", made from "Bref" which means "Brief" in French and the suffix "er", which means "more").

Installation

npm install -D brefer

For PNPM and YARN, just replace npm install with pnpm add or yarn add in the commands above.

Warning! Brefer is not yet ready for production (well, Svelte 5 neither). Expect bugs and breaking changes, as the syntax is not yet entirely decided.

Usage

Basic usage

The configuration is pretty easy:

// svelte.config.js
import { vitePreprocess } from "@sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte";
import { breferPreprocess } from "brefer";

export default {
	preprocess: [breferPreprocess(), vitePreprocess()]
};

If you don't want to use a Vite plugin and rather use Svelte's preprocess API, you can stop your configuration here and skip to the next paragraph.

The Brefer's Vite plugin allows you to also preprocess Svelte modules (.svelte.js files).

// vite.config.js
import { defineConfig } from "vite";
import { brefer } from "brefer";

export default defineConfig({
	// If you use other preprocessors, put brefer first
	plugins: [brefer()]
});

Options

You can pass options to the plugin. Those options contain 2 properties: include and exclude. You might already be familiar with them as a lot of other frameworks also use it.

You can check the documentation on Rollup's website.

// vite.config.js
import { defineConfig } from "vite";
import { brefer } from "brefer";

export default defineConfig({
	plugins: [
		brefer({
			include: [
				// Files to preprocess
				"src/**/*.svelte",
				"src/**/*.svelte.js"
			],
			exclude: [
				// Files you don't want preprocessed
				"tests/**/*.svelte"
			]
		})
	]
});

Why?

What was your reaction when Rich Harris announced that Svelte 4's reactivity, which was as concise as a JS framework reactivity syntax could be, would be abandoned in favor of ~~Vue~~ Runes syntax? If you were delighted, Brefer is probably not for you. Personally, I didn't want to write $state and $derived everytime I defined a new reactive variable. That's the reason I started this project.

Ok but... What is the Brefer syntax?

With Brefer, I opted for a more straightforward syntax:

Variables defined with let are reactive by default

Using the rune $(...) creates $derived values

Using the rune $$(() => {...}) creates $effect expressions

All subrunes for $effect (like $effect.root for example) are usable with $$

That is (almost) all you have to know.

Here are some examples

<script>
	let count = $state(0);
	let double = $derived(count * 2);
</script>

<button onclick="{() => count++}">
clicks: {count} / double: {double}
</button>

<script>
let count = 0;
let double = $(count * 2);
</script>

<button onclick="{() => count++}">
	clicks: {count} / double: {double}
</button>

<script>
	class Counter {
		count = $state(0);
		double = $derived(this.count * 2);

		increment() {
			this.count++;
		}
	}

	let counter = new Counter();
</script>

<button onclick="{() => counter.increment()}">
	clicks: {counter.count} / double: {counter.double}
</button>

<script>
	class Counter {
		count = 0;
		double = $(this.count * 2);

		increment() {
			this.count++;
		}
	}

	let counter = new Counter();
</script>

<button onclick="{() => counter.increment()}">
	clicks: {counter.count} / double: {counter.double}
</button>

Typescript

Brefer supports typescript out of the box as it uses @babel/parser to parse the script content of .svelte files and .svelte.[js|ts] modules.

Other features

Defining non-reactive variables

To define non-reactive variables, you have 2 choices:

• Use the var or const keywords

  This choice is better for everyday use, e.g for temporary variables or loops

  NB: if you use the var keyword, Brefer will preprocess it to use let instead

• Use the $static rune

  This choice if better for when the first one can't be used, e.g for class properties which are defined without any keyword or when defining constants with const

$derived.by

Brefer takes care of figuring out if you're using a function or an expression inside the $(...) rune and will preprocess it to $derived or $derived.by depending on the result.

For very rare edges cases, this could cause bugs, especially with nested callbacks. As an example, if you do that:

let foo = "bar";

function yeet() {
	return () => `Yeet the ${foo}`;
}

let baz = $(yeet());

Brefer will think you're trying to use an expression and will preprocess it to let baz = $derived(yeet()) even if $derived.by should be used.

Keep that in mind if you don't want to waste hours trying to debug your non-working code.

NB: This bug can also occure with the $untrack rune, so watch out.

The $untrack rune

Brefer exposes an $untrack rune so you don't have to import { untrack } from "svelte" everytime. Brefer takes care of it all.

Moreover, you can pass reactive variables to $untrack as a reference, no need to wrap it inside an arrow function. However, keep the problem mentionned in the previous paragraph about the potential bugs that it could cause.

import { untrack } from "svelte";

let count = $state(1);
let double = $derived(count * 2);

const cleanup = $effect.root(() => {
	console.log(
		count,
		untrack(() => double)
	);

	return () => {
		console.log("cleanup");
	};
});

let count = 1;
let double = $(count * 2);

const cleanup = $$.root(() => {
	console.log(count, $untrack(double));

	return () => {
		console.log("cleanup");
	};
});

$state subrunes

To be able to define variables with $state.raw or use $state.snapshot given the shorten syntax for $state's, Brefer exposes the $raw and $snapshot runes.

Use them just as you would use $state.raw and $svelte.snapshot.

Pros and cons

Pros

• More concise than Svelte 5's syntax
• Works with Typescript
• Easy to integrate
• It's a preprocessor, so you can still use Svelte 5's syntax if you want to
• Can preprocess svelte modules (.svelte.[js|ts])

Cons

• You have to use a preprocessor
• Some rare edge cases might induce bugs, especially when deep nested functions are involved

Contribute

If you like the concept and want to contribute, feel free to open an issue or a pull request. Also, if you have any idea to improve or extend the syntax, I'm all ears (you can contact me on discord @kildesu)!