babel-plugin-which-builtins
v0.0.2
Published
This is a Babel plugin which attempts to determine which ECMAScript 2015/2016/2017 library built-ins are used by a codebase and only import polyfills for just the built-ins which are actually used. It is a replacement for importing the entirety of `babel-
Downloads
18
Readme
#babel-plugin-which-builtins
This is a Babel plugin which attempts to determine which ECMAScript 2015/2016/2017
library built-ins are used by a codebase and only import polyfills for just the
built-ins which are actually used. It is a replacement for importing the
entirety of babel-polyfill
.
##Instructions
First install the plugin to your project, along with core-js
and regenerator-runtime
:
npm install --save-dev babel-plugin-which-builtins core-js regenerator-runtime
Next add it to your Babel configuration after all the plugins that transform your
code. For example, in a .babelrc
file:
{
"plugins": { "which-builtins" }
}
##What does it do?
When this plugin encounters code that seems to use new built-in JavaScript global
objects, static methods, or instance methods, it adds an import
declaration
for a polyfill that will add that built-in. For example, with this input:
const foo = Array.from([1,2,3]);
the plugin will produce this output:
import "core-js/modules/es6.array.from"
import "core-js/modules/es6.array.iterator"
const foo = Array.from([1,2,3]);
Note that this transformer does not insert the polyfill itself; it just adds an import statement for the polyfill. If you want to run this code in a browser, you will need to run it through a bundler like webpack, browserify, or rollup.
In additon to the ECMAScript polyfills of core-js
, the plugin also looks for
and polyfills references to regeneratorRuntime
, which are created by the standard
Babel plugin for transforming generators.
##When does the plugin fail?
Unfortunately, in a completely dynamic language like JavaScript, static analysis
can only go so far, and as a result babel-plugin-which-builtins
cannot catch
every usage of new built-ins. There are two main known cases where the plugin
will fail.
The first case in which the plugin will fail is when code refers to one of the
built-in globals that has new methods (like Math
or Array
) using dynamic code
to refer to the global object. As an example:
// this case will work.
var a = Math.cos(90);
var { cos } = Math;
// this case will not work because Math doesn't have a direct
// property access in the code.
function getMath() { return Math; }
var b = getMath().cos(90);
var { cos } = getMath();
The second case in which the plugin will fail is when code refers to a new built-in static or instance method in a dynamic way. For example:
// these cases will work.
var a = "foo".startsWith("f");
var b = "foo"["startsWith"]("f");
var { startsWith } = "foo";
var c = Math.cos(90);
var d = Math["cos"](90);
var { cos } = Math;
// these cases will not work.
var e = "foo"["starts" + "With"]("f");
var { ["starts" + "With"]: f } = "foo";
var g = "startsWith".forEach(method => "foo"[method]("f"))[0];
var h = Math["c" + "os"](90);
var { ["c" + "os"]: i } = Math;
function getCos() {
return "cos";
}
var j = Math[getCos()](90);
var { [getCos()]: k } = Math;
##Instance methods may produce false positives
Some of the new built-ins in ES2015/2016/2017 are instance methods, like
Array.prototype.find
or String.prototype.startsWith
. It's very difficult
(bordering on impossible) to statically figure out the type of a variable
in JavaScript, so this plugin is conservative and assumes that any reference to
a property with the same name of a new instance method is a reference to that
instance method. For example:
// this triggers an import of String.prototype.startsWith.
var a = "foo".startsWith("f");
var { startsWith } = "foo";
// this also triggers an import of String.prototype.startsWith (false positive).
var b = null;
var c = b.startsWith("f");
var { startsWith } = b;
// this also triggers an import of String.prototype.startsWith (false positive).
var e = b["startsWith"];
The theory here is that including an instance method polyfill when it's not needed is better than not including it when it is needed.
#What features are polyfilled?
- Generators
regeneratorRuntime
- Global objects
DataView
Int8Array
Uint8Array
Uint8ClampedArray
Int16Array
Uint16Array
Int32Array
Uint32Array
Float32Array
Float64Array
Map
Set
WeakMap
WeakSet
Promise
Symbol
Reflect
- Static methods
Array.from
Array.of
Math.acosh
Math.asinh
Math.atanh
Math.cbrt
Math.clz32
Math.cosh
Math.expm1
Math.fround
Math.hypot
Math.imul
Math.log1p
Math.log10
Math.log2
Math.sign
Math.sinh
Math.tanh
Math.trunc
Number.isFinite
Number.isInteger
Number.isSafeInteger
Number.isNaN
Number.EPSILON
Number.MIN_SAFE_INTEGER
Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER
Object.assign
Object.is
Object.getOwnPropertySymbols
Object.setPrototypeOf
Object.values
Object.entries
Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors
String.raw
- Instance methods
Array.prototype.copyWithin
Array.prototype.find
Array.prototype.findIndex
Array.prototype.fill
Array.prototype.includes
Function.prototype.name
RegExp.prototype.flags
RegExp.prototype.match
RegExp.prototype.replace
RegExp.prototype.split
RegExp.prototype.search
String.prototype.codePointAt
String.prototype.fromCodePoint
String.prototype.padStart
String.prototype.padEnd
String.prototype.repeat
String.prototype.startsWith
String.prototype.endsWith
String.prototype.includes