@wonderlandlabs/freactal-engine
v1.0.6
Published
This repository is the repo for the store engine behind freactal. This module does NOT include code for binding the stores to React (or anything browser related). That code is contained in [freactal-connect](https://github.com/bingomanatee/freactal-conn
Downloads
7
Readme
This repository is the repo for the store engine behind freactal. This module does NOT include code for binding the stores to React (or anything browser related). That code is contained in freactal-connect
Store Engines
Store Engines have the following signature:
- state: a property of the current store's state. Ideally an object.
- actions: a collection of mutator functions that take in the engine and arguments and return a mutated state. Actions can also return a promise, as they are wrapped in a promise structure.
- subscribe: a method to subscribe (RxJS) to the changes of the state data.
note, effects as an alias to actions are also provided by the StoreEngine for backwards compatibility.
Everything else about the store engine is optional.
Want to point the store to a Component state? go to town. Want to point the store to a REST interface? why not. Want to store state in localStorage/sessionStorage? Sounds good. Want to use Generators to communicate changes? If you can make it work.
Stores can be bound in the React Tree and inherit down the DOM, overriding parent styles -- this is the default model of Freactal. However they can also be kept separate from the DOM tree and broadcast across the tree as their states change.
States can be combined using the StoreReducer class; this is the mechanic that allows context inheritance to work. But you can also create discrete stores that manage specific spheres and blend them into a shared state, a la Redux reducers.
The StoreEngine class
The StoreEngine class has the following signature:
const engine = new StoreEngine({
state, //? {object},
initializer, // ? {function}
actions, // ? {object}
effects, // ? {object}
},
actions //? {Object: hash of functions);
);
note there are multiple ways to provide actions.
- as the second argument (easiest)
- as a property ('actions') of the first argument.
- as a property ('effects') of the first argument for backwards compatibility.
The Initialization Cycle
initialization can be accomplished synchronously, asynchronously or both. Engines without an initialValue will have a state value of Symbol(BASE_STATE_UNINITIALIZED_VALUE)
until store.initialize() {promise}
is called. At that point the engine's status will move from Symbol(BASE_STATE_STATUS_UNINITIALIZED)
to Symbol(BASE_STATE_STATUS_INITIALIZED)
. .initialize()
is called automatically before every action, and is idempotent.
If a property with NEITHER initialValue or initializer is passed, IT is considered to be the initial value. So by definition either the initialValue or the initializer is present in all scenarios.
| state | initializer | state after constructor | state after await initialize()
|
|------|------|-----|-----|
| -- | function | BASE_STATE_UNINITIALIZED_VALUE | result of initializer(engine) |
| value | -- | state | initialValue |
| value | function | state | result of initializer(engine) |
Actions
Actions are functions that take in the engine's actions and optional arguments and return a function that takes in the states value and returns a modified state; or a promise that results in that function.
Actions can call other actions from the engine, other promise actions, etc. They can be asynchronous.
So, all these actions are equivalent:
{
doubleA: () => (state) => {
return Object.assign({}, state, {a: 2 * state.a});
},
doubleAWithPromise: () => new Promise((resolve) => {
resolve((state) => Object.assign({}, state, {a: 2 * state.a}))
});
}
A note under the hood
The StoreEngine
inherits from Store
class. The Store
class manages data storage and change streaming;
the StoreEngine
adds functionality for Action management. If you want to write your own StoreEngine,
you might find extending Store with your own Action system easier than a wholly unique rebuild.
The Inheritance Pattern: Freactal Reducer
StateEngines can inherit data and actions from each other through the StoreReducer class. This class takes an array of two (or more) StoreEngines and behaves like a StoreEngine that is the union of these two classes.
Example:
let engine1 = new StoreEngine({a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}, {
setA: update((store, a) => ({a})),
setB: update((store, b) => ({b})),
addAtoB: (actions) => (state) => Object.assign({}, state, {b: (state.a + state.b)})
})
let engine2 = new StoreEngine({a: 10, c: 30}, {
setA: update((store, a) => ({a})),
setC: update((store, c) => ({c})),
addAtoC: (actions) => (state) => Object.assign({}, state, {c: (state.a + state.c)}),
doBoth: async (actions) => {
await actions.addAtoB();
await actions.addAtoC();
return (state) => state;
}
})
let combined = new StoreEngineReducer([engine1, engine2]);
/**
* combined's actions: {setA, setB, seteC, addAtoB, addAtoC}
* combined's initial state: {a: 10, b: 2, c: 30}
*/
okay but... addAtoB -- which A? and addAtoC: which A, and which C?
When there are key overlaps both in state and actions, the second engine (or rightmost if there are more than two) takes precedence. This means that if a rightmost engine's method/state value shadows ones from an engine before it, the rightmost engine wins out.
From the point of view The golden rule of Freactal is:
actions are bound to the state of the engine they are originally defined in.
this means combined's addAtoC
will both get the values of A and C from engine1 and will write to
the state of engine1. combined's state is always re-computed after each action and re-blended from
all the states of its' source engines. An StoreEngineReducer
is a 'virtual class' that combines
both the actions and states of its sources but the flow of information is one-way - it
continually recombines state from its components out to its consumers.
Access to other actions
The actions of the rightmost engine has access to the actions to its left. the example here,
doBoth()
, shows how a combined action can allow one engine to access another engines' actions.
however it doesn't let the rightmost engine to have access to the leftmost actions' state.
This means if you want to pull information from a child engine into a parent engines' computations, you have to get it from outside the action (and pass it in as a parameter). This means for instance, there is *no way to inject a shadowed state value of a leftmost engine into an action in a parent's action.
Customizing reduction
How to avoid shadow effects when reducing engines? As with Redux, you can write custom reduction to combine actions and/or states. This is purely optional - if you can work with shadow/inheritance you don't need this utility. But for those that need it, custom store blending can let you isolate or select state and properties from each engine and combine them however you want.
engineAlpha = new StoreEngine(
{
a: 1,
b: 2,
c: 3,
},
{
setA: update((actions, a) => () => ({ a })),
setB: update((actions, b) => () => ({ b })),
addAtoB: () => (state) => {
const { a, b } = state;
return Object.assign({}, state, { b: a + b });
},
},
);
engineAlpha.name = 'alpha';
engineBeta = new StoreEngine({
a: 10,
c: 20,
d: 30,
}, {
setA: update((actions, a) => () => ({ a })),
addAllToD: () => ({ a, c, d }) => {
const sum = a + c + d;
return Object.assign({}, {
a,
c,
d: sum,
});
},
});
engineBeta.name = 'beta';
Instead of blending the state and actions we want to name-space each one based on the engine name (an ad-hoc property we slap on the engine post-construction).
Because state reduction is done in the context of RxJS it operates on the states themselves, so we use the index of the current item as a hint:
```jsx harmony
blend = new StoreEngineReducer([engineAlpha, engineBeta], {
stateReducer: (memo, state, i) => {
const out = { ...memo };
const keys = Object.keys(state);
switch (i) {
case 0:
keys.forEach((name) => {
out[
${name}-alpha`] = state[name];
});
break;
case 1:
keys.forEach((name) => {
out[`${name}-beta`] = state[name];
});
break;
default:
} return out; },
...actions are a lot easier as the actionReducer has access to the entire engine.
```jsx harmony
// ...
actionReducer: ({ engines }) => engines.reduce((actions, engine) => {
const out = { ...actions };
const keys = Object.keys(engine.actions);
keys.forEach((name) => {
out[`${name}_${engine.name}`] = engine.actions[name];
});
return out;
}, {}),
});
Now the state is expressed out to namespaced properties.
console.log(blend.state);
/**
*
{
'a-alpha': 1,
'a-beta': 10,
'b-alpha': 2,
'c-alpha': 3,
'c-beta': 20,
'd-beta': 30,
}
*/
as is shown in the tests, this rebranding of state is not present in the action code; they are still attached to the localized values of state.