@sbsto/safe
v0.1.1
Published
A library to help you escape try-catch hell.
Downloads
2
Readme
safe
A library to help save people from try-catch hell.
Example 1: safe
In typescript, it can be difficult to manage handling different types of error. For example, you might want to handle an IncorrectPassword
error differently to a UserNotFound
error.
import { safe } from "@sbsto/safe";
enum SignInError {
IncorrectPassword = "IncorrectPassword",
UserNotFound = "UserNotFound",
}
import { customLogger } from './logger';
/**
* Setting `DEBUG=1` in your .env will cause `safe` to log on errors.
* It defaults to `console` as the logger, but you may pass a custom one if you prefer.
*/
const signInSafe = safe<SignInError>({ logger: customLogger });
async function signIn(email: string, password: string) {
const user = await db.select(user).where({ email: "[email protected]" });
if (!user) {
return signInSafe.fail(SignInError.UserNotFound);
}
if (user.passwordHash !== hashPassword(password)) {
return signInSafe.fail(SignInError.IncorrectPassword);
}
return signInSafe.ok(input);
}
// Then, we can handle these accordingly & type-safely, e.g. in a route handler
export const handler = (req: Request) => {
const signInResult = await signIn(req.body.email, req.body.password);
// First, we check if it's OK
if (signInResult.ok) {
return redirect("/dashboard");
}
// Then, we know it's one of two errors
if (signInResult.error === SignInError.UserNotFound) {
return redirect("signup");
}
// Here, we know they entered the wrong password
return response(403);
};
The above is probably bad security. But you get the idea. This might seem trivial here (it probably wouldn't be so bad to just do with with functions, e.g. trying to find the user, doing something if that fails, then verifying the password, doing something if that fails, otherwise continuing. But I like to encapsulate all of that in the parent function, without giving up a type-safe way to handle each error variant. This also becomes useful when your errors can propagate through many functions (e.g. a parent's safe can account for the error types from multiple children's safes).
Example 2: catcher
Imagine you have a function with a return that depends on two fallible operations.
Here's how you'd use catcher
to manage this.
import { catcher } from "@sbsto/safe";
function fallibleOperation() {
return "hello world";
}
function fallibleAsyncOperation(data: string) {
return Promise.resolve("hello world");
}
async function getTwoResultsExample() {
const result1 = catcher(fallibleOperation);
if (!result1.ok) {
return result1.error; // handle first error here
}
const result2 = await catcher(() => fallibleAsyncOperation(result1.data));
if (!result2.ok) {
return result2.error; // handle second error here
}
return [result1, result2];
} // inferred return type is Promise<Result<[Result<string, Error>, Result<string, Error>], Error>>
As opposed to this:
async function getTwoResultsWithoutCatcher() {
try {
const result1 = fallibleOperation(); // try can fail here
const result2 = await fallibleAsyncOperation(result1); // or here
return [result1, result2];
} catch (e) {
return e; // so we can't handle the error differently for each operation
}
} // inferred return type is Promise<unknown>
// or this:
async function getTwoResultsWithoutCatcherTwo() {
try {
const result1 = fallibleOperation(); // try can fail here
try {
const result2 = await fallibleAsyncOperation(result1); // or here
return [result1, result2];
} catch (e) {
return e; // handle second error here
}
} catch (e) {
return e; // handle first error here
}
} // inferred return type is Promise<unknown>
The catcher
has a couple benefits:
- It has better type inferrence for the parent function
- It allows you to specifically handle as many fallible operations as you need without deeply nested try-catch.