@release-kit/client-dynamic-env
v0.1.0
Published
Dynamically insert environment variables into bundled file and extract them in runtime
Downloads
14
Readme
Before you start
The README on main
branch may contain some unreleased changes.
Go to release/latest
branch to see the actual README for the latest version from NPM.
Navigation
Installation
NPM:
npm install @release-kit/client-dynamic-env
Yarn:
yarn add @release-kit/client-dynamic-env
Usage
Dynamically insert env
Add to your Docker entrypoint script:
# will also use .env.production and .env.production.local
export CDE_ENV="production"
# will use .env files located in apps/client directory
export CDE_ENV_DIR="apps/client"
# will take only envs prefixed with VITE_
export CDE_ENV_PREFIX="VITE_"
# will insert filtered envs into /client/dist/index.html file
export CDE_DESTINATION="/client/dist/index.html"
# will replace {{ ENV }} with filtered envs base64 string
export CDE_SLOT="{{ ENV }}"
source <(wget -qO- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/release-kit/client-dynamic-env/main/scripts/insert.sh)
The scripts loads .env
files using the following order:
.env
(lowest priority).env.$CDE_ENV
.env.$CDE_ENV.local
.env.local
(highest priority)
Environment variables are always expanded, so you can reuse them.
Extract env on client
Assume we have the following in our index.html
:
<head>
<script>
window.env = '{{ ENV }}'
</script>
</head>
We can extract env from window.env
in production, and from import.meta.env
/ process.env
in development:
import { extractEnv } from '@release-kit/client-dynamic-env'
export const env = extractEnv({
env: import.meta.env.DEV ? 'development' : 'production',
developmentEnv: import.meta.env,
productionSource: window.env,
validate: (env) => {
if (!env.VITE_API_URL) throw new Error('No VITE_API_URL specified')
return { apiUrl: env.VITE_API_URL }
},
})
Contributing
- Fork this repo
- Use the Regular flow
Please follow Conventions
Maintenance
The dev branch is main
- any developer changes is merged in there.
Also, there is a release/latest
branch. It always contains the actual source code for release published with latest
tag.
All changes is made using Pull Requests - push is forbidden. PR can be merged only after successfull test-and-build
workflow checks.
When PR is merged, release-drafter
workflow creates/updates a draft release. The changelog is built from the merged branch scope (feat
, fix
, etc) and PR title. When release is ready - we publish the draft.
Then, the release
workflow handles everything:
- It runs tests, builds a package, and publishes it
- It synchronizes released tag with
release/latest
branch
Regular flow
- Create feature branch
- Make changes in your feature branch and commit
- Create a Pull Request from your feature branch to
main
The PR is needed to test the code before pushing to release branch - If your PR contains breaking changes, don't forget to put a
BREAKING CHANGES
label - Merge the PR in
main
- All done! Now you have a drafted release - just publish it when ready
Prerelease flow
- Assume your prerelease tag is
beta
- Create
release/beta
branch - Create feature branch
- Make changes in your feature branch and commit
- Create a Pull Request from your feature branch to
release/beta
The PR is needed to test the code before pushing to release branch - Create Github release with tag like
v1.0.0-beta
, pointing torelease/beta
branch
For nextbeta
versions use semver build syntax:v1.0.0-beta+1
- After that, the
release
workflow will publish your package with thebeta
tag - When the
beta
version is ready to becomelatest
- create a Pull Request fromrelease/beta
tomain
branch - Continue from the Regular flow's #5 step
Conventions
Feature branches:
- Should start with
feat/
,fix/
,docs/
,refactor/
, and etc., depending on the changes you want to propose (see pr-labeler.yml for a full list of scopes)
Commits:
- Should follow the Conventional Commits specification
- You can find supported types and scopes into
.cz-config.js
Pull requests:
- Should have human-readable name, for example: "Add a TODO list feature"
- Should describe changes
- Should have correct labels