npm package discovery and stats viewer.

Discover Tips

  • General search

    [free text search, go nuts!]

  • Package details

    pkg:[package-name]

  • User packages

    @[username]

Sponsor

Optimize Toolset

I’ve always been into building performant and accessible sites, but lately I’ve been taking it extremely seriously. So much so that I’ve been building a tool to help me optimize and monitor the sites that I build to make sure that I’m making an attempt to offer the best experience to those who visit them. If you’re into performant, accessible and SEO friendly sites, you might like it too! You can check it out at Optimize Toolset.

About

Hi, 👋, I’m Ryan Hefner  and I built this site for me, and you! The goal of this site was to provide an easy way for me to check the stats on my npm packages, both for prioritizing issues and updates, and to give me a little kick in the pants to keep up on stuff.

As I was building it, I realized that I was actually using the tool to build the tool, and figured I might as well put this out there and hopefully others will find it to be a fast and useful way to search and browse npm packages as I have.

If you’re interested in other things I’m working on, follow me on Twitter or check out the open source projects I’ve been publishing on GitHub.

I am also working on a Twitter bot for this site to tweet the most popular, newest, random packages from npm. Please follow that account now and it will start sending out packages soon–ish.

Open Software & Tools

This site wouldn’t be possible without the immense generosity and tireless efforts from the people who make contributions to the world and share their work via open source initiatives. Thank you 🙏

© 2024 – Pkg Stats / Ryan Hefner

@npmcli/metavuln-calculator

v8.0.1

Published

Calculate meta-vulnerabilities from package security advisories

Downloads

10,985,955

Readme

@npmcli/metavuln-calculator

Calculate meta-vulnerabilities from package security advisories

This is a pretty low-level package to abstract out the parts of @npmcli/arborist that calculate metavulnerabilities from security advisories. If you just want to get an audit for a package tree, probably what you want to use is arborist.audit().

USAGE

const Calculator = require('@npmcli/metavuln-calculator')
// pass in any options for cacache and pacote
// see those modules for option descriptions
const calculator = new Calculator(options)

// get an advisory somehow, typically by POSTing a JSON payload like:
// {"pkgname":["1.2.3","4.3.5", ...versions], ...packages}
// to /-/npm/v1/security/advisories/bulk
// to get a payload response like:
// {
//   "semver": [
//     {
//       "id": 31,
//       "url": "https://npmjs.com/advisories/31",
//       "title": "Regular Expression Denial of Service",
//       "severity": "moderate",
//       "vulnerable_versions": "<4.3.2"
//     }
//   ],
//   ...advisories
// }
const arb = new Aborist(options)
const tree = await arb.loadActual()
const advisories = await getBulkAdvisoryReportSomehow(tree)

// then to get a comprehensive set of advisories including metavulns:
const set = new Set()
for (const [name, advisory] of Object.entries(advisories)) {
  // make sure we have the advisories loaded with latest version lists
  set.add(await calculator.calculate(name, {advisory}))
}

for (const vuln of set) {
  for (const node of tree.inventory.query('name', vuln.name)) {
    // not vulnerable, just keep looking
    if (!vuln.testVersion(node.version))
      continue
    for (const { from: dep, spec } of node.edgesIn) {
      const metaAdvisory = await calculator.calculate(dep.name, vuln)
      if (metaAdvisory.testVersion(dep.version, spec)) {
        set.add(metaAdvisory)
      }
    }
  }
}

API

Class: Advisory

The Calculator.calculate method returns a Promise that resolves to a Advisory object, filled in from the cache and updated if necessary with the available advisory data.

Do not instantiate Advisory objects directly. Use the calculate() method to get one with appropriate data filled in.

Do not mutate Advisory objects. Use the supplied methods only.

Fields

  • name The name of the package that this vulnerability is about
  • id The unique cache key for this vuln or metavuln. (See Cache Keys below.)
  • dependency For metavulns, the dependency that causes this package to be have a vulnerability. For advisories, the same as name.
  • type Either 'advisory' or 'metavuln', depending on the type of vulnerability that this object represents.
  • url The url for the advisory (null for metavulns)
  • title The text title of the advisory or metavuln
  • severity The severity level info/low/medium/high/critical
  • range The range that is vulnerable
  • versions The set of available versions of the package
  • vulnerableVersions The set of versions that are vulnerable
  • source The numeric ID of the advisory, or the cache key of the vulnerability that causes this metavuln
  • updated Boolean indicating whether this vulnerability was updated since being read from cache.
  • packument The packument object for the package that this vulnerability is about.

vuln.testVersion(version, [dependencySpecifier]) -> Boolean

Check to see if a given version is vulnerable. Returns true if the version is vulnerable, and should be avoided.

For metavulns, dependencySpecifier indicates the version range of the source of the vulnerability, which the module depends on. If not provided, will attempt to read from the packument. If not provided, and unable to read from the packument, then true is returned, indicating that the (not installable) package version should be avoided.

Cache Keys

The cache keys are calculated by hashing together the source and name fields, prefixing with the string 'security-advisory:' and the name of the dependency that is vulnerable.

So, a third-level metavulnerability might have a key like:

'security-advisory:foo:'+ hash(['foo', hash(['bar', hash(['baz', 123])])])

Thus, the cached entry with this key would reflect the version of foo that is vulnerable by virtue of dependending exclusively on versions of bar which are vulnerable by virtue of depending exclusively on versions of baz which are vulnerable by virtue of advisory ID 123.

Loading advisory data entirely from cache without hitting an npm registry security advisory endpoint is not supported at this time, but technically possible, and likely to come in a future version of this library.

calculator = new Calculator(options)

Options object is used for cacache and pacote calls.

calculator.calculate(name, source)

  • name The name of the package that the advisory is about
  • source Advisory object from the npm security endpoint, or a Advisory object returned by a previous call to the calculate() method. "Advisory" objects need to have:
    • id id of the advisory or Advisory object
    • vulnerable_versions range of versions affected
    • url
    • title
    • severity

Fetches the packument and returns a Promise that resolves to a vulnerability object described above.

Will perform required I/O to fetch package metadata from registry and read from cache. Advisory information written back to cache.

Dependent Version Sampling

Typically, dependency ranges don't change very frequently, and the most recent version published on a given release line is most likely to contain the fix for a given vulnerability.

So, we see things like this:

3.0.4 - not vulnerable
3.0.3 - vulnerable
3.0.2 - vulnerable
3.0.1 - vulnerable
3.0.0 - vulnerable
2.3.107 - not vulnerable
2.3.106 - not vulnerable
2.3.105 - vulnerable
... 523 more vulnerable versions ...
2.0.0 - vulnerable
1.1.102 - not vulnerable
1.1.101 - vulnerable
... 387 more vulnerable versions ...
0.0.0 - vulnerable

In order to determine which versions of a package are affected by a vulnerability in a dependency, this module uses the following algorithm to minimize the number of tests required by performing a binary search on each version set, and presuming that versions between vulnerable versions within a given set are also vulnerable.

  1. Sort list of available versions by SemVer precedence

  2. Group versions into sets based on MAJOR/MINOR versions.

    3.0.0 - 3.0.4
    2.3.0 - 2.3.107
    2.2.0 - 2.2.43
    2.1.0 - 2.1.432
    2.0.0 - 2.0.102
    1.1.0 - 1.1.102
    1.0.0 - 1.0.157
    0.1.0 - 0.1.123
    0.0.0 - 0.0.57
  3. Test the highest and lowest in each MAJOR/MINOR set, and mark highest and lowest with known-vulnerable status. ((s) means "safe" and (v) means "vulnerable".)

    3.0.0(v) - 3.0.4(s)
    2.3.0(v) - 2.3.107(s)
    2.2.0(v) - 2.2.43(v)
    2.1.0(v) - 2.1.432(v)
    2.0.0(v) - 2.0.102(v)
    1.1.0(v) - 1.1.102(s)
    1.0.0(v) - 1.0.157(v)
    0.1.0(v) - 0.1.123(v)
    0.0.0(v) - 0.0.57(v)
  4. For each set of package versions:

    1. If highest and lowest both vulnerable, assume entire set is vulnerable, and continue to next set. Ie, in the example, throw out the following version sets:

      2.2.0(v) - 2.2.43(v)
      2.1.0(v) - 2.1.432(v)
      2.0.0(v) - 2.0.102(v)
      1.0.0(v) - 1.0.157(v)
      0.1.0(v) - 0.1.123(v)
      0.0.0(v) - 0.0.57(v)
    2. Test middle version MID in set, splitting into two sets.

      3.0.0(v) - 3.0.2(v) - 3.0.4(s)
      2.3.0(v) - 2.3.54(v) - 2.3.107(s)
      1.1.0(v) - 1.1.51(v) - 1.1.102(s)
    3. If any untested versions in Set(mid..highest) or Set(lowest..mid), add to list of sets to test.

      3.0.0(v) - 3.0.2(v) <-- thrown out on next iteration
      3.0.2(v) - 3.0.4(s)
      2.3.0(v) - 2.3.54(v) <-- thrown out on next iteration
      2.3.54(v) - 2.3.107(s)
      1.1.0(v) - 1.1.51(v) <-- thrown out on next iteration
      1.1.51(v) - 1.1.102(s)

When the process finishes, all versions are either confirmed safe, or confirmed/assumed vulnerable, and we avoid checking large sets of versions where vulnerabilities went unfixed.

Testing Version for MetaVuln Status

When the dependency is in bundleDependencies, we treat any dependent version that may be vulnerable as a vulnerability. If the dependency is not in bundleDependencies, then we treat the dependent module as a vulnerability if it can only resolve to dependency versions that are vulnerable.

This relies on the reasonable assumption that the version of a bundled dependency will be within the stated dependency range, and accounts for the fact that we can't know ahead of time which version of a dependency may be bundled. So, we avoid versions that may bundle a vulnerable dependency.

For example:

Package foo depends on package bar at the following version ranges:

foo version   bar version range
1.0.0         ^1.2.3
1.0.1         ^1.2.4
1.0.2         ^1.2.5
1.1.0         ^1.3.1
1.1.1         ^1.3.2
1.1.2         ^1.3.3
2.0.0         ^2.0.0
2.0.1         ^2.0.1
2.0.2         ^2.0.2

There is an advisory for [email protected] - 1.3.2. So:

foo version   vulnerable?
1.0.0         if bundled (can use 1.2.3, which is not vulnerable)
1.0.1         yes (must use ^1.2.4, entirely contained in vuln range)
1.0.2         yes (must use ^1.2.5, entirely contained in vuln range)
1.1.0         if bundled (can use 1.3.3, which is not vulnerable)
1.1.1         if bundled (can use 1.3.3, which is not vulnerable)
1.1.2         no (dep is outside of vuln range)
2.0.0         no (dep is outside of vuln range)
2.0.1         no (dep is outside of vuln range)
2.0.2         no (dep is outside of vuln range)

To test a package version for metaVulnerable status, we attempt to load the manifest of the dependency, using the vulnerable version set as the avoid versions. If we end up selecting a version that should be avoided, then that means that the package is vulnerable by virtue of its dependency.