@northscaler/rbac
v1.0.0-pre.4
Published
Role-based access control for arbitrary securables
Downloads
9
Readme
rbac
A role-based access control supporting library
This library provides a means to declare policies governing access control to arbitrary securables based on roles and interrogate those policies to make access control decisions.
NOTE: In the context of this discussion & this module, the term "role" refers to a type, not an instance.
Security concepts
In any security decision, there are four fundamental things required:
Securable
: the thing access to which is being governed.Principal
: the thing that is attempting to perform anAction
on aSecurable
. This is sometimes also known as a "subject".Action
: the activity that is being attempted.Access Control Entry
: the thing that bindsSecurable
,Principal
s andAction
s together along with an access control strategy that determines whether the activity is allowed to take place.Access Control Entry
s are also sometimes known as "permissions", but that implies a positive sense that breaks down when the security implementation supports explicit denials.Acess Control Entry
s are often collected into access control lists (or ACLs). Common access control strategies are "permit" & "deny", but can also be algorithmic depending on context, like "permit only if it's sunny".
Mapping of security concepts to this library
In the context of this library, a Principal
is represented by a named role as a string.
The base class in this library, AbstractRoleBasedAccessControlRepository
, supports arbitrary Securable
s, but also provides a concrete implementation, MethodAccessControlRepository
, that secures methods on JavaScript classes; the Securable
s for that implementation are, then, the methods themselves.
The notion of Action
has not yet been made explicit in this library.
In the case of MethodAccessControlRepository
, the Action
is to simply invoke the method.
The library authors anticipate adding support for Action
s in a future release.
The notion of an access control list is manifested as a security policy that you declare and pass to a repository's constructor.
Each policy is a JavaScript Array
of entries of literal Object
s.
Each entry in the policy is an Access Control Entry
.
Each entry can have a roles
property and/or a strategy
property, but it must have some representation of the Securable
whose access control is being declared.
Since roles in this implementation are String
s, the type of an entry's roles
is a RegExp
that is matched to role strings.
An entry's strategy
can be
- the JavaScript literal
true
, to indicate that access is permitted, - the JavaScript literal
false
, to indicate that access is explicitly denied, or - a
Function
that takes contextual information and returns aBoolean
indicating whether or not access is permitted.
In the absence of the roles
property, the value is assumed to be all roles, or the regular expression /^.+$/
.
In the absence of the strategy
property, this library makes the conservative choice to deny, meaning the default strategy is false
.
Each concrete implementation of a repository determines what property or properties comprise the identification of the Securable
.
In the case of MethodAccessControlRepository
, the Securable
is a JavaScript class
method, so the repository expects two properties, classes
& methods
, both of which are expected to be RegExp
s and are matched against the values given in the repository's interrogation methods.
Capabilities
Each repository, once given a policy, allows the consumer to interrogate whether a role is allowed to access a Securable
.
The interrogative methods are as follows.
permits({role, securable, data})
: returnstrue
if the givenrole
(which can also be an array of roles) is (are) allowed to access thesecurable
given optional, arbitrary, contextualdata
, else returnsfalse
.explicitlyDenies({role, securable, data})
: returnstrue
if the givenrole
(or roles) is (are) explicitly denied the ability to access thesecurable
given optional, arbitrary, contextualdata
, else returnsfalse
.
Note the subtle distinction between the two.
Users of this library will almost always use permits
; expicitlyDenies
is intended for more subtle use cases.
Example
Let's take MethodAccessControlRepository
as an example.
NOTE: this is a low-tech example. For a high-tech usage of this library that leverages JavaScript decorators, see the test
should work as intended in an app
insrc/test/MethodAccessControlRepository.spec.js
.
First, declare your policy.
We want Administrator
s to be able to do anything, Teller
s & Manager
s to be able to open Account
s, but only Manager
s can close high-value Account
s.
// in file security.js
module.exports = [{
// Administrators can do anything
roles: /^Administrator$/, // role name regex
strategy: true, // true means "permit", false means "explicitly deny"
classes: /^.+$/, // regex of class names
methods: /^.+$/ // regex of method names
}, {
// Tellers & Managers can open accounts
roles: /^Teller|Manager$/,
strategy: true,
classes: /^Account$/,
methods: /^open$/
}, {
// Only Managers can close high-value accounts
strategy: ({role, account}) => { // custom access control strategy function
switch (role) {
case 'Teller': return account.balance < 10000
case 'Manager': return true
default: return false
}
},
classes: /^Account$/,
methods: /^close$/
}]
Next, instantiate your repository with the policy.
// in file rbac.js
const { MethodAccessControlRepository } = require('@northscaler/rbac')
const acl = require('./security')
module.exports = new MethodAccessControlRepository(policy)
Now, you have a repository that you can query for access control decisions. To make use of it, you need to either manually code calls to it along your regular call paths, or use a slicker, aspect-oriented solution like JavaScript decorators to intercept method calls and make access control decisions.
Here's a simple example using manual, inline security calls.
// in file Account.js
const getCallerRoles = require('./getCallerRoles') // magic that gets the roles of the current caller
const rbac = require('./rbac') // from above
function checkSecurity({ clazz, method, data}) {
if (!rbac.permits({role: getCallerRoles(), securable: {class: clazz, method}, data})) {
throw new Error(`no roles among ${roles.join(',')} permitted to invoke ${clazz}.${method}`)
}
}
class Account {
static open({id, firstName, lastName}) {
checkSecurity({clazz: 'Account', method: 'open'})
return new Account({id, firstName, lastname})
}
constructor({id, firstName, lastName}) {
this.id = id
this.firstName = firstName
this.lastName = lastName
this.balance = 0
}
close() {
checkSecurity({clazz: 'Account', method: 'close', data: this}) // `this` will show up as `account` in strategy above
// ...logic to close account
}
}