@ltv/moleculer-apollo-server-mixin
v0.1.30
Published
An Apollo Server v4 mixin for moleculerjs. Schema first & compatible with GraphQL codegen
Downloads
8
Maintainers
Readme
moleculer-apollo-server-mixin
An Apollo Server v4 mixin for moleculerjs. Schema first & compatible with GraphQL codegen
Features
- GraphQL Schema first
- Apollo Server v4
- Compatible with GraphQL Codegen
- DataLoader
- Tracing
- Metrics
The inspiration
Generally, you can create your standalone Apollo Server and use it as a supgraphql server, btw, you have to do manything if you want to approach the micro-services architecture.
Luckily, we have moleculerjs
which is very comprehensive framework for developing a micro-services system. Basically, the moleculerjs
service provide the moleculer-web
as a HTTP Gateway for publishing RESTFul APIs.
If you want to support the GraphQL, you have to use moleculer-apollo-server
(a mixin developed by Icebob
the moleculerjs
author.). The problem is, this mixin is not well support typescript, and separated schema definition.
The approach of moleculer-apollo-server
is using action
as a graphql resolver, and using action configuration to define the GraphQL schema.
It looks like:
const schema = {
actions: {
hello: {
graphql: {
query: "hello: String"
},
handler(ctx) {
return "Hello Moleculer!"
}
},
welcome: {
params: {
name: "string"
},
graphql: {
mutation: "welcome(name: String!): String"
},
handler(ctx) {
return `Hello ${ctx.params.name}`;
}
}
}
}
The drawbacks of this approach:
- You have no good insight about your schema definition, Your type, your schema are locating scattered whenever in your service schema. It will be easy for first sight, but will be difficult for maintenance.
- You have no typing. Actually, it's not really, you can able to define the
ctx
type again. Check the below examples
graphql: {
mutation: "welcome(name: String!): String"
},
handler(ctx: Context<{ name: string }>) {
return `Hello ${ctx.params.name}`
}
Lets see. You already defined the GraphQL schema then it will not make sense when you have to define the type again. In the example, there is only one name
param, and there is no issue with it. But, if you have many params,
You need to define it again many time, and ..., I bet you get the point now.
- So if you're working with javascript? Probably, you can guide your IDE with the javascript docs but you can not reuse it somewhere, and this is unsafe typings.
Finally, I decided to write this mixin to overcome the typings issue and approach with schema first.
Examples
- schema definition (
./graphql/user.schema
)
import { gql } from '@ltv/moleculer-apollo-server-mixin';
export const typeDefs = gql`
extend type Query {
me: User!
user(id: ID!): User
allUsers: [User]
}
enum Role {
USER
ADMIN
}
type User implements Node {
id: ID!
username: String!
email: String!
role: Role!
createdAt: DateTime!
}
`;
- service schema (
services/user/user.svc.ts
)
import {
GraphQLActionSchema,
ServiceSettings,
User,
} from '@shared/graphql/generated';
import { print } from 'graphql';
import { typeDefs } from './graphql/user.schema';
const users: User[] = [
{ id: '1', username: 'user1' } as User,
{ id: '2', username: 'user2' } as User,
];
const name = 'user';
type UserActionSchema = {
resolveUsername: GraphQLActionSchema<'User'>['username'];
};
const actions: GraphQLActionSchema<'Query' | 'User'> & UserActionSchema = {
allUsers: {
handler: async () => {
return users;
},
},
user: {
params: {
id: 'string',
},
handler: async (ctx) => {
const { id } = ctx.params;
return users.find((user) => user.id === id);
},
},
resolveUsername: {
handler: async (ctx) => {
const { username } = ctx.params.$parent
return `transformed ${username}`;
},
},
};
const settings: ServiceSettings<typeof name, keyof typeof actions> = {
typeDefs: print(typeDefs),
resolvers: {
Query: {
allUsers: 'user.allUsers',
user: 'user.user',
},
User: {
username: 'user.resolveUsername',
},
},
};
export default { name, settings, actions };