@henrygd/queue
v1.0.7
Published
Tiny async queue with concurrency control. Like p-limit or fastq, but smaller and faster.
Downloads
2,591
Maintainers
Readme
@henrygd/queue
Tiny async queue with concurrency control. Like p-limit
or fastq
, but smaller and faster. See comparisons and benchmarks below.
Works with:
Usage
Create a queue with the newQueue
function. Then add async functions - or promise returning functions - to your queue with the add
method.
You can use queue.done()
to wait for the queue to be empty.
import { newQueue } from '@henrygd/queue'
// create a new queue with a concurrency of 2
const queue = newQueue(2)
const pokemon = ['ditto', 'hitmonlee', 'pidgeot', 'poliwhirl', 'golem', 'charizard']
for (const name of pokemon) {
queue.add(async () => {
const res = await fetch(`https://pokeapi.co/api/v2/pokemon/${name}`)
const json = await res.json()
console.log(`${json.name}: ${json.height * 10}cm | ${json.weight / 10}kg`)
})
}
console.log('running')
await queue.done()
console.log('done')
The return value of queue.add
is the same as the return value of the supplied function.
const response = await queue.add(() => fetch('https://pokeapi.co/api/v2/pokemon'))
console.log(response.ok, response.status, response.headers)
[!TIP] If you need support for Node's AsyncLocalStorage, import
@henrygd/queue/async-storage
instead.
Queue interface
/** Add an async function / promise wrapper to the queue */
queue.add<T>(promiseFunction: () => PromiseLike<T>): Promise<T>
/** Returns a promise that resolves when the queue is empty */
queue.done(): Promise<void>
/** Empties the queue (active promises are not cancelled) */
queue.clear(): void
/** Returns the number of promises currently running */
queue.active(): number
/** Returns the total number of promises in the queue */
queue.size(): number
Comparisons and benchmarks
| Library | Version | Bundle size (B) | Weekly downloads | | :-------------------------------------------------------------- | :------ | :-------------- | :--------------- | | @henrygd/queue | 1.0.6 | 355 | dozens :) | | p-limit | 5.0.0 | 1,763 | 118,953,973 | | async.queue | 3.2.5 | 6,873 | 53,645,627 | | fastq | 1.17.1 | 3,050 | 39,257,355 | | queue | 7.0.0 | 2,840 | 4,259,101 | | promise-queue | 2.2.5 | 2,200 | 1,092,431 |
Note on benchmarks
All libraries run the exact same test. Each operation measures how quickly the queue can resolve 1,000 async functions. The function just increments a counter and checks if it has reached 1,000.[^benchmark]
We check for completion inside the function so that promise-queue
and p-limit
are not penalized by having to use Promise.all
(they don't provide a promise that resolves when the queue is empty).
Browser benchmark
This test was run in Chromium. Chrome and Edge are the same. Firefox and Safari are slower and closer, with @henrygd/queue
just edging out promise-queue
. I think both are hitting the upper limit of what those browsers will allow.
You can run or tweak for yourself here: https://jsbm.dev/TKyOdie0sbpOh
Node.js benchmarks
p-limit
is very slow because it uses AsyncResource.bind
on every run, which is much faster in Bun than in Node or Deno.
Ryzen 5 4500U | 8GB RAM | Node 22.3.0
Ryzen 7 6800H | 32GB RAM | Node 22.3.0
Deno benchmarks
Ryzen 5 4500U | 8GB RAM | Deno 1.44.4
Ryzen 7 6800H | 32GB RAM | Deno 1.44.4
Bun benchmarks
Ryzen 5 4500U | 8GB RAM | Bun 1.1.17
Ryzen 7 6800H | 32GB RAM | Bun 1.1.17
Cloudflare Workers benchmark
Uses oha to make 1,000 requests to each worker. Each request creates a queue and resolves 5,000 functions.
This was run locally using Wrangler on a Ryzen 7 6800H laptop. Wrangler uses the same workerd runtime as workers deployed to Cloudflare, so the relative difference should be accurate. Here's the repository for this benchmark.
| Library | Requests/sec | Total (sec) | Average | Slowest | | :------------- | :----------- | :---------- | :------ | :------ | | @henrygd/queue | 816.1074 | 1.2253 | 0.0602 | 0.0864 | | promise-queue | 647.2809 | 1.5449 | 0.0759 | 0.1149 | | fastq | 336.7031 | 3.0877 | 0.1459 | 0.2080 | | async.queue | 198.9986 | 5.0252 | 0.2468 | 0.3544 | | queue | 85.6483 | 11.6757 | 0.5732 | 0.7629 | | p-limit | 77.7434 | 12.8628 | 0.6316 | 0.9585 |
Related
@henrygd/semaphore
- Fastest javascript inline semaphores and mutexes using async / await.
License
[^benchmark]: In reality, you may not be running so many jobs at once, and your jobs will take much longer to resolve. So performance will depend more on the jobs themselves.