@digicatapult/tsimp
v2.0.12
Published
**Note: this library has been forked from https://github.com/tapjs/tsimp in order to publish a version of `tsimp` that works with `typescript` `v5.6.2` (see https://github.com/tapjs/tsimp/issues/29). There is no intent to maintain this fork at this stage
Downloads
651
Keywords
Readme
Note: this library has been forked from https://github.com/tapjs/tsimp in order to publish a version of tsimp
that works with typescript
v5.6.2
(see https://github.com/tapjs/tsimp/issues/29). There is no intent to maintain this fork at this stage and this fork will be deleted once the aforementioned issue is resolved.
tsimp 😈
A TypeScript IMPort loader for Node.js
What It Is
This is an importer that runs Node.js programs written in TypeScript, using the official TypeScript implementation from Microsoft.
It is designed to support full typechecking support, with acceptable performance when used repeatedly (for example, in a test suite which spawns many TS processes).
Why Is It
There are quite a few TypeScript loaders and compilers available! Which one should you choose, and why did I need to create this one?
- swc is a TypeScript compiler implementation in Rust
- tsx is a zero-config TypeScript executer that aims to be a drop-in replacement for node, powered by esbuild.
- ts-node is probably the most established of these, with a huge feature set and support for every version of node and TypeScript you could possibly want.
How this differs:
- It uses the TypeScript implementation from Microsoft as its
compiler. No shade towards swc and esbuild, they're fast and
can do a lot, but the goal of
tsimp
is strict consistency with the "official"tsc
program, and just using it is the simplest way to do that. - It supports the
--import
andModule.register()
behavior added in node v20.6, only falling back to warning-laden experimental APIs when that's not available. - Type checking is enabled by default, so no need to run an extra
tsc --noEmit
step after running tests, using a persistent sock daemon and a generous amount of caching to make it performant. - It's just a module loader, not a bunch of other things. So there's no repl, no bundler, etc. Pretty much all it does is make TypeScript modules in Node work.
USAGE
Install tsimp
with npm:
npm install tsimp
Run TypeScript programs like this in node v20.6 and higher:
node --import=tsimp/import my-typescript-program.ts
Or like this in Node versions prior to v20.6:
node --loader=tsimp/loader my-typescript-program.ts
Or you can use tsimp
as the executable to run your program (but
the import/loader is ~100ms faster because it doesn't incur an
extra spawn
call):
tsimp my-typescript-program.ts
Note that while tsimp
run without any arguments will start the
Node repl, and in that context it will be able to import/require
typescript modules, it does not include a repl that can run
TypeScript directly. This is just an import loader.
In Node v20.6 and higher, you can also load tsimp
in your
program, and from that point forward, TypeScript modules will
Just Work.
Note that import
declarations happen in parallel before the
code is executed, so you'll need to split it up like this:
import 'tsimp'
// has to be done as an async import() so that it occurs
// after the tsimp import is finished. But any imports that the
// typescript program does can be "normal" top level imports.
const { SomeThing } = await import('./some-thing.ts')
By comparison, this won't work, because the imports happen in parallel.
import 'tsimp'
import { SomeThing } from './some-thing.ts'
CommonJS require()
is patched as well. To use tsimp
in
CommonJS programs, you can run it as described above, or
require()
it in your program.
//commonjs
require('tsimp')
// now typescript can be loaded
require('./blah.ts')
In Node version 20.6 and higher, this will also attach the
required loaders for ESM import support. In earlier Node
versions, you must use --loader=tsimp/loader
for ESM support.
Configuration
Most configuration is done by looking to the nearest
tsconfig.json
file at or above the module entry point in the
folder tree.
You can use a different filename by setting
TSIMP_PROJECT=<filename>
in the environment.
If there is a tsimp
field in the tsconfig json file, then that
will override anything else in the file. For example:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"rootDir": "./src",
"declaration": true,
"esModuleInterop": true,
"forceConsistentCasingInFileNames": true,
"inlineSources": true,
"jsx": "react",
"module": "nodenext",
"moduleResolution": "nodenext",
"noUncheckedIndexedAccess": true,
"resolveJsonModule": true,
"skipLibCheck": false,
"sourceMap": false,
"strict": true,
"target": "es2022"
}
"tsimp": {
"compilerOptions": {
"skipLibCheck": true,
"strict": false
}
}
}
Sourcemaps are always enabled when using tsimp
, so that errors
reference the approriate call sites within TypeScript code.
Config File Changes and extends
Options
If the tsconfig.json
file used by tsimp changes, then it will
automatically expire its memory and disk caches, because new
options can result in very different results.
However, while extends
is fully supported (if tsc
can load
it, so can tsimp
, because that's how it loads config), any
extended config files will not be tracked for changes or cause
the cache to expire.
When in doubt, tsimp --restart
will reload everything as
needed.
"module"
, "moduleResolution"
, and other must-haves
The ultimate resulting module style for tsimp must be something intelligible by Node, without any additional bundling or transpiling.
Towards that end, the module
and moduleResolution
settings
are both hard-coded to NodeNext
in tsimp, regardless of what is
in tsconfig.json
.
Also, the following fields are always hard-coded by tsimp:
outDir
Because tsimp isn't a build tool, but rather a module importer, it doesn't actually write the emitted JavaScript to disk. (Ok, technically it does, but only as a cache.) So, theoutDir
is hard-coded to.tsimp-compiled
, but this is never used.sourceMap
This is always set toundefined
, because:inlineSourceMap
is always set totrue
. It's just much simpler and faster to have the sourcemap inline with the generated JavaScript output.inlineSources
is always set tofalse
. There is no need to bloat the output, when the input is definitely present on disk.declarationMap
anddeclaration
are always set tofalse
, because type declarations are not relevant.noEmit
is always setfalse
, because the entire point is to get the JavaScript code for Node to run. That said, the "emit" is fully virtual, and nothing is written to disk (except to avoid compiling the same code multiple times).
File Extensions, Module Resolution, etc.
The same rules for file extensions, module resolution, and
everything else apply when using tsimp
as when using tsc
.
That means: if you're running in ESM mode, you need to write your
imports ending in .js
even though the actual file on disk is
.ts
, because that's how TS does it when module
is set to
"NodeNext"
and the target dialect is ESM.
Compilation Diagnostics
Set the TSIMP_DIAG
environment variable to control what happens
when there are compilation diagnostics.
TSIMP_DIAG=warn
(default) Print diagnostics tostderr
, but still transpile the code if possible.TSIMP_DIAG=error
Print diagnostics tostderr
, and fail if there are any diagnostics.TSIMP_DIAG=ignore
Just transpile the code, ignoring all diagnostics. (Similar to ts-node'sTS_NODE_TRANSPILE_ONLY=1
option.)
How fast is it?
If the daemon is running, it's very fast, even if type checking is enabled. If the daemon is running and its previously compiled the file you're running, it's zomg extremely fast, like "so fast you'll think it's broken" fast, outperforming TypeScript compilers written in Rust and Go, since it literally doesn't have to do anything except check some file stats and then hand the cached results to Node. (In fact, since it caches in memory as well as to disk, it might even be faster in many cases than running plain old JavaScript, if the program is large.)
And, this is with full type checking, which is sort of the point
of using TypeScript. No matter how fast your compiler is, if
you're then running tsc --noEmit
to check your types, then it's
not actually gaining much.
If the daemon is not running, and it's a cold start with no cache, it's pretty slow, comparable with ts-node, especially if type checking is enabled.
An exceptionally not scientific example comparison:
How is it so fast?
Basic caching and work skipping.