@chkt/continuity
v1.0.0-beta.4
Published
Sequentially aligned promise resolution
Downloads
3
Maintainers
Readme
Continuity
Sequentially aligned promise resolution
Install
npm install @chkt/continuity
Use
In this example we create three promises, each immediately resolving to the values 1
, 2
and 3
.
Then the processing of each promise becomes blocked for a random amount of time by calling randomTimeout()
.
Afterwards The execution of subsequent .then()
calls is being realigned
to correspond the the order in which their calls to sequencer.align()
were made.
import * as assert from 'assert';
import { createSequencer } from '@chkt/continuity';
function randomTimeout(val:number) : Promise<number> {
return new Promise(resolve => {
setTimeout(
resolve.bind(null, val),
Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000)
);
});
}
const sequencer = createSequencer();
const result:number[] = [];
const promises = [
Promise.resolve(1),
Promise.resolve(2),
Promise.resolve(3)
];
const resolved = promises.map(promise => promise
.then(randomTimeout)
.then(sequencer.align())
.then(val => result.push(val))
);
Promise.all(resolved).then(() => {
assert.deepStrictEqual(result, [ 1, 2, 3 ]);
});
Note that while the order in which promises are resolved is guaranteed,
by the nature of common promise implementations,
the order in which subsequent .then()
handlers are executed is not.
import * as assert from 'assert';
import { createSequencer } from '@chkt/continuity';
const sequencer = createSequencer();
const ids:string[] = [];
const idA = sequencer.register();
const promiseB = sequencer
.immediate()
.then(function pushB() {
ids.push('b');
});
const promiseA = Promise
.resolve()
.then(() => sequencer.resolve(idA))
.then(function pushA() {
ids.push('a');
});
Promise
.all([ promiseA, promiseB ])
.then(() => {
assert.deepStrictEqual(ids, [ 'a', 'b' ]);
});
For most modern javascript engines (including V8 and Spidermonkey) the example above will resolve to false
.
Although the Promises are resolved in the order promiseA
, promiseB
,
both engines schedule the execution of pushA
after the execution of pushB
.
Using .schedule()
instead will guarantee handler execution order.
Api
interface SequencerConfig {
readonly firstId? : number;
readonly maxRatio? : number;
readonly maxDelay? : number;
}
enum result_type { immediate, late, queued }
interface ScheduleResult {
readonly id : number;
readonly type : result_type;
}
interface Sequencer {
register() : number; // get a sequential id
schedule(id:number, fn:(result:ScheduleResult) => void) : void; // schedule a registered id for processing
resolve(id:number) : Promise<ScheduleResult>; // get a promise representing a scheduled id
immediate() : Promise<ScheduleResult>; // shorthand for sequencer.resolve(sequencer.register())
align<T>() : (val:T) => Promise<T>; // get a trigger function for scheduling
assign<T>(p:Promise<T>) : Promise<T>; // shorthand for promise.then(sequencer.align())
}
type createSequencer = (config:SequencerConfig) => Sequencer;