@bilabila/luaparse
v0.0.2
Published
A Lua parser in JavaScript
Downloads
2
Readme
luaparse
A Lua parser written in JavaScript, for my bachelor's thesis at Arcada.
Installation
Install through bower install luaparse
or npm install luaparse
.
Usage
CommonJS
var parser = require('luaparse');
var ast = parser.parse('i = 0');
console.log(JSON.stringify(ast));
AMD
require(['luaparse'], function(parser) {
var ast = parser.parse('i = 0');
console.log(JSON.stringify(ast));
});
Browser
<script src="luaparse.js"></script>
<script>
var ast = luaparse.parse('i = 0');
console.log(JSON.stringify(ast));
</script>
Parser Interface
Basic usage:
luaparse.parse(code, options);
The output of the parser is an Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) formatted in JSON.
The available options are:
wait: false
Explicitly tell the parser when the input ends.comments: true
Store comments as an array in the chunk object.scope: false
Track identifier scopes.locations: false
Store location information on each syntax node.ranges: false
Store the start and end character locations on each syntax node.onCreateNode: null
A callback which will be invoked when a syntax node has been completed. The node which has been created will be passed as the only parameter.onCreateScope: null
A callback which will be invoked when a new scope is created.onDestroyScope: null
A callback which will be invoked when the current scope is destroyed.onLocalDeclaration: null
A callback which will be invoked when a local variable is declared. The identifier will be passed as the only parameter.luaVersion: '5.1'
The version of Lua the parser will target; supported values are'5.1'
,'5.2'
,'5.3'
and'LuaJIT'
.extendedIdentifiers: false
Whether to allow code points ≥ U+0080 in identifiers, like LuaJIT does. See 'Note on character encodings' below if you wish to use this option. Note: settingluaVersion: 'LuaJIT'
currently does not enable this option; this may change in the future.
The default options are also exposed through luaparse.defaultOptions
where
they can be overriden globally.
There is a second interface which might be preferable when using the wait
option.
var parser = luaparse.parse({ wait: true });
parser.write('foo = "');
parser.write('bar');
var ast = parser.end('"');
This would be identical to:
var ast = luaparse.parse('foo = "bar"');
AST format
If the following code is executed:
luaparse.parse('foo = "bar"');
then the returned value will be:
{
"type": "Chunk",
"body": [
{
"type": "AssignmentStatement",
"variables": [
{
"type": "Identifier",
"name": "foo"
}
],
"init": [
{
"type": "StringLiteral",
"value": "bar",
"raw": "\"bar\""
}
]
}
],
"comments": []
}
Note on character encodings
Unlike strings in JavaScript, Lua strings are not Unicode strings, but bytestrings (sequences of 8-bit values); likewise, implementations of Lua parse the source code as a sequence of octets. However, the input to this parser is a JavaScript string, i.e. a sequence of 16-bit code units (not necessarily well-formed UTF-16). This poses a problem of how those code units should be interpreted, particularly if they are outside the Basic Latin block ('ASCII').
Currently, this parser handles Unicode input by encoding it in WTF-8,
and reinterpreting the resulting code units as Unicode code points. This
applies to string literals and (if extendedIdentifiers
is enabled) to
identifiers as well. Lua byte escapes inside string literals are interpreted
directly as code points, while Lua 5.3 \u{}
escapes are similarly decoded
as UTF-8 code units reinterpreted as code points. It is as if the parser input
was being interpreted as ISO-8859-1, while actually being encoded in UTF-8.
This ensures that no otherwise-valid input will be rejected due to encoding errors. Assuming the input was originally encoded in UTF-8 (which includes the case of only containing ASCII characters), it also preserves the following properties:
- String literal nodes representing the same string value in Lua (and
identifier nodes, if
extendedIdentifiers
is enabled) will have the same interpretation in the AST: e.g. the Lua literals'💩'
,'\u{1f4a9}'
and'\240\159\146\169'
will all have"\u00f0\u009f\u0092\u00a9"
in their.value
property, and likewiselocal 💩
will have the same string in its.name
property. - The
.length
property of decoded string values in the AST is equal to the value that the#
operator would return in Lua.
Maintaining those properties makes the logic of static analysers and code transformation tools simpler. However, it poses a problem when displaying strings to the user and serialising AST back into a string; to recover the original bytestrings, values transformed in this way will have to be encoded in ISO-8859-1.
Other solutions to this problem may be considered in the future. Some of them have been listed below, with their drawbacks:
- A mode that instead treats the input as if it were decoded according
to ISO-8859-1 (or the
x-user-defined
encoding) and rejects code points that cannot appear in that encoding; may be useful for source code in encodings other than UTF-8- Still tricky to get semantics correctly
- Using an
ArrayBuffer
orUint8Array
for source code and/or string literals- May fail to be portable to older JavaScript engines
- Cannot be (directly) serialised as JSON
- Values of those types are fixed-length, which makes manipulation cumbersome; they cannot be incrementally built by appending.
- They cannot be used as keys in objects; one has to use
Map
andWeakMap
instead
- Using a plain
Array
of numbers in the range [0, 256)- Memory-inefficient
- May bloat the JSON serialisation considerably
- Cannot be used as keys in objects either
- Storing string literal values as ordinary
String
values, and requiring that escape sequences in literals constitute well-formed UTF-8; an exception is thrown if they do not- UTF-8 chauvinism; imposes semantics that may be unwanted
- Reduced compatibility with other Lua implementations
- Like above, but instead of throwing an exception, ill-formed escapes are
transformed to unpaired surrogates, just like Python's
surrogateescape
encoding error handler- Destroys the property that
("\xc4" .. "\x99") == "\xc4\x99"
- If the AST is encoded in JSON, some JSON libraries may refuse to parse it
- Destroys the property that
Custom AST
The default AST structure is somewhat inspired by the Mozilla Parser API but can easily be overriden to customize the structure or to inject custom logic.
luaparse.ast
is an object containing all functions used to create the AST, if
you for example wanted to trigger an event on node creations you could use the
following:
var luaparse = require('luaparse'),
events = new (require('events').EventEmitter);
Object.keys(luaparse.ast).forEach(function(type) {
var original = luaparse.ast[type];
luaparse.ast[type] = function() {
var node = original.apply(null, arguments);
events.emit(node.type, node);
return node;
};
});
events.on('Identifier', function(node) { console.log(node); });
luaparse.parse('i = "foo"');
this is only an example to illustrate what is possible and this particular
example might not suit your needs as the end location of the node has not been
determined yet. If you desire events you should use the onCreateNode
callback
instead).
Lexer
The lexer used by luaparse can be used independently of the recursive descent
parser. The lex function is exposed as luaparse.lex()
and it will return the
next token up until EOF
is reached.
Each token consists of:
type
expressed as an enum flag which can be matched withluaparse.tokenTypes
.value
line
,lineStart
range
can be used to slice out raw values, eg.foo = "bar"
will return aStringLiteral
token with the valuebar
. Slicing out the range on the other hand will return"bar"
.
var parser = luaparse.parse('foo = "bar"', { wait: true });
parser.lex(); // { type: 8, value: "foo", line: 1, lineStart: 0, range: [0, 3] }
parser.lex(); // { type: 32, value: "=", line: 1, lineStart: 0, range: [4, 5]}
parser.lex(); // { type: 2, value: "bar", line: 1, lineStart: 0, range: [6, 11] }
parser.lex(); // { type: 1, value: "<eof>", line: 1, lineStart: 0, range: [11 11] }
parser.lex(); // { type: 1, value: "<eof>", line: 1, lineStart: 0, range: [11 11] }
Examples
Have a look in the examples directory of the repository for some code examples or check them out live.
luaparse(1)
The luaparse
executable can be used in your shell by installing luaparse
globally using npm:
$ npm install -g luaparse
$ luaparse --help
Usage: luaparse [option]... [file|code]...
Options:
-c|--code [code] parse code snippet
-f|--file [file] parse from file
-b|--beautify output an indenteted AST
--[no]-comments store comments. defaults to true
--[no]-scope store variable scope. defaults to false
--[no]-locations store location data on syntax nodes. defaults to false
--[no]-ranges store start and end character locations. defaults to false
-q|--quiet suppress output
-h|--help
-v|--version
--verbose
Examples:
luaparse --no-comments -c "locale foo = \"bar\""
luaparse foo.lua bar.lua
Example usage
$ luaparse "i = 0"
{"type":"Chunk","body":[{"type":"AssignmentStatement","variables":[{"type":"Identifier","name":"i"}],"init":[{"type":"NumericLiteral","value":0,"raw":"0"}]}],"comments":[]}
Support
Has been tested in at least IE6+, Firefox 3+, Safari 4+, Chrome 10+, Opera 10+, Node 0.4.0+, RingoJS 0.8-0.9, Narwhal 0.3.2, Rhino 1.7R4-1.7R5, Nashorn 1.8.0.
Quality Assurance
TL;DR simply run make qa
. This will run all quality assurance scripts but
assumes you have it set up correctly.
Begin by cloning the repository and installing the development dependencies
with npm install
. To test AMD loading for browsers you should run bower
install
which will download RequireJS.
The luaparse test suite uses testem as a
test runner, and because of this it's very easy to run the tests using
different javascript engines or even on locally installed browsers. Currently
the default runner uses PhantomJS and node so when
using make test
or npm test
you should have PhantomJS installed.
Test runners
make test
uses PhantomJS and node.make testem-engines
uses PhantomJS, node, narwhal, ringo, rhino and rhino 1.7R5. This requires that you have the engines installed.make test-node
uses a custom command line reporter to make the output easier on the eyes while practicing TDD.- By installing
testem
globally you can also run the tests in a locally installed browser.
Other quality assurance measures
- You can check the function complexity using complexity-report
using
make complexity-analysis
- Running
make coverage
will generate the coverage report. To simply check that all code has coverage you can runmake coverage-analysis
. make lint
,make benchmark
,make profile
.
Documentation
By running make docs
all documentation
will be generated.
Projects using/extending luaparse
Acknowledgements
- Initial tests are scaffolded from yueliang and then manually checked for error.
- Much of the code is based on LuaMinify, the Lua source and Esprima. All awesome projects.
License
MIT